Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

37-630 Filter caps 60 and 62 backwards on schematic?
#1

Working on a 37-630T chassis and noticed the filter caps 60 and 62 seemed backwards on the schematic.  Searched this forum and found thread saying it was in fact incorrect and was corrected in Service Bulletin 251.  Can't find SB 251 to verify.  About to solder new caps in place and want to make sure before committing.  Anyone know for sure?

Not sure how to add link, if successful it will take you to page where 37-630 schematic is.
Thank you

http://www.audiophool.com/Philco.html

Oh! That was easy.  Icon_crazy
#2

Their sch are in dejavu format; not everyone could see it.
Judging by 620 here
http://www.nostalgiaair.org/pagesbymodel...013212.pdf

yes it seem like they flipped the symbols.
But no one in their right mind will not connect the filter cap minus side up anyway.
I restored 620 two years ago, did not even notice that.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

Tks Morzh.  What got me concerned and paranoid was I finished up a I think it was a 38-60 and one of the filter caps was properly "backwards"  + to CT so remembering that I began to second guess.  Been many years since I retired from Navy elec job.  It's coming back but it is good to have a source of knowledge here on the forum.  TKs again.
Tt
#4

No, what you probably are talking about is the cap that in 620 is #68 (though it is not electrolytic here, but in some radio it is).
This cap is always placed with its plus to GND because the other side is the rectifier's negative which is always more negative than the GND (it is in fact the most negative point in the whole radio).

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#5

Yep it's been awhile but that sounds about right.  TKs and I appreciate your time.
Tt




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 60
>>and found that the field coil is bad. Should be 1140 ohms, tests at 1.1k ohms. You have one stringent crit...morzh — 02:07 PM
Philco model 60
Yes I was there. I got some real bargains there. Plus a Zenith 7G605 clipper that I have been trying to find for a fair ...Radios1340 — 01:46 PM
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 6913 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 6912 Guest(s)
Avatar

>