Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 37-660 Replacement IF Transformer Proposal
#1

The second IF transformer on my Philco 37-660 has an open primary winding. I did some exploratory surgery but the winding appears to have a break somewhere in the inside of the winding. No breaks at the terminals, or anything else obvious (other than some "green" areas). I unwound turns from both ends as far as I could go. The original is for 470kHz. Primary is 12 ohms, and the secondary is 8 ohms and appears to be tapped. I have plenty of 456kHz donors, but only one 470kHz. 

I am wondering if I can get away with using an IF transformer from a Philco 37-34, which is a 6-volt DC set using 2-volt battery tubes. The winding resistances of the 37-34 transformer are virtually the same as my original: primary 11 ohms, secondary 7.5 ohms. The coil and trimmer assembly even fits the original shield EXACTLY and the alignment holes line up. My main worry is that the original secondary (marked 8 ohms) appears to be center tapped. But when I measure the winding resistance at the leads it measures 8 ohms not 4 ohms. And surgery does not indicate a tapped winding.

Just curious if I can get away with this, or if there is some fundamental reason why a battery radio transformer would not work in an AC set.
#2

It should I just concerted a battery set to ac it worked ok.
#3

My best guess is that on the '660 the If transformer tap is to provide a lower impedance source for the detector. I would use it (one from the '34) with the wire connected to the tap moved over the top of the winding. Don't think there is an issue.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Paul, thanks, Anything can help. Gary Thanks, lemme look! PS. Looked it up. They have kits and parts for mod...morzh — 02:45 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Paul, thanks, Anything can help. Gary Thanks, lemme look!morzh — 02:39 PM
46-1201 Trip Switch Spring
I deleted the other thread, as it was duplicate and did not have the photo. Please proceed with this one.morzh — 02:37 PM
46-1201 Trip Switch Spring
Hello, first post here, bear with me. I've been electronically refurbishing a 46-1201 that I received from a relative. ...ConcernedFeller — 01:46 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
I am late to this post, amazing amount of work for a speaker Mike. You must like the challenge. I have a speaker from an...Paul Philco322 — 01:04 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, give this site a look for your spider. Can't hurt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! -GaryGarySP — 12:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Rod, Bubble packaging? The one I know (if you mean the large bubble type) is really thin. I have some at home. Is there...morzh — 12:23 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Q8. What's the meaning of life? I have read that someone made a spider out of the clear plastic from bubble packagin...RodB — 11:07 AM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
So, Q1. Does anyone know where to get the spider. Q2. If there is no such place, what material is best? I doubt tin is...morzh — 09:43 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran The oxidation seems to go deep, a few layers. The break starts right there, but then it will occur on every la...morzh — 07:35 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 7928 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 7927 Guest(s)
Avatar

>