Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Problems in a little PT2
#1

I have always assumed that the plates of the stator and rotor of a tuning capacitor should never be shorted. Now in looking for problems on a current PT2 project, I find the oscillator section of the tuning capacitor is shorted. After careful inspection and not locating plates in contact, I back checked a couple other sets I have on the bench and find that they all have shorted oscillator sections.
I must ask, what's up?
#2

It is in parallel with the oscillator coil so appears like it is shorted. You would have to disconnect the wires from it to confirm for sure if it is shorted. I have come across shorted tuning caps when folks try cleaning with steel wool, never ever use steel wool around them.

Gregb
#3

Thanks Gregb
In fact when I disconnected from the coil it did not show short and suspected this was the case but I couldn't explain it to myself.
Larry
#4

lets start with 56.6k ohm value for secondary of 2nd IF transformer measured between 7C6 pin 5 (d1) and high side of volume control.
next I replaced the 40/80 ohm line resistor with 10w wire wounds. in the circuit the 40 measures good while the 80 measures 3.7 ohms.
thoughts please
Larry
#5

Wouldn't worry about the IF coil more than likely the 47K resistor has drifted some but is of little consequence. If I had it apart to replace the rubber wire I'd check and replace. But the 4 ohm/80 ohm resistor is an issue. 5w is ok total dissipation is 1.8w, I generally go X3. Dissipation is less for the 40 ohm (abt 1 w), it's job is to stop the lamp from burning out from the ac inrush.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#6

threads merged 
http://philcoradio.com/phorum/showthread.php?tid=4586
II. Multiple threads on the same subject not allowed.


sam

Some day, and that day may never come, I will call upon you to do a service for me. But until that day, accept this justice as a gift
mafiamen2
#7

lets start with 56.6k ohm value for secondary of 2nd IF transformer measured between 7C6 pin 5 (d1) and high side of volume control.
next I replaced the 40/80 ohm line resistor with 10w wire wounds. in the circuit the 40 measures good while the 80 measures 3.7 ohms.
thoughts please
Larry
#8

Threads merged (again).

Elfiself, please pay attention to Sam's post (#6 above). Thank you.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#9

Thanks for the reply Terry. I have replaced all resistors and caps including the 470k you mentioned in your reply. My concern is the secondary of the 2nd IF is indicated on schm. as 21ohms but is reading 56k ohms. Do you mean the IF transformer wiring could account for such a dramatic increase in resistance and if so should I consider rewiring it?
Larry
#10

My thought is that are several parts INSIDE the 2nd IF transformer. Two fixed caps (probably 100mmfd ea) and a 47K resistor. The 47K is in series w/secondary of the transformer. So if you measure from the diode to the top of the volume control that 47K is in series it adds to the total resistance measured. Typically the coil would be abt 20 ohms or so but perhaps the 47K has drifted up in value.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#11

got it
thanks Terry
So I finally got some sound from the speaker,( found a miss placed 130 ohm resistor on the 50L6) unfortunately its a loud hum not affected by the volume control.
What would be the fun if it just worked?
Larry




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done. I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; As I was saying it doesn't look like they used much of a bobbin for the field coil, not like a Magnavox one wou...Arran — 05:49 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
This AK84 was bought, I think, last fall. For a whopping $100. It has been, according to the seller, restored. As I go ...morzh — 05:48 PM
Philco model 60
Plus I forgot that I have a spare complete Philco FC speaker, that would work perfectly, now that I don’t need it. Got i...Radios1340 — 05:36 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4309 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 4308 Guest(s)
Avatar

>