37-670 - bakelite block discrepancy
Posts: 120
Threads: 10
Joined: Jul 2011
City: Glendale, CA
Hi,
I am slowly doing a restoration on my 37-670 console and find that there's a discrepancy between what my radio has and what the schematic says. From what I understand, this is something Philco did a lot.
My schematic gives part #71, a .015 mfd dual bakelite block, a part number of 3903-LU. According to the Philco Service Bulletin No 289 the capacitors in that 3903-LU block are .01 and .006.
However, my actual radio has for part #71, a 3793-DU bakelite block that appears to have been installed by the factory. The No 289 service bulletin for that block calls for two .015 mfd capacitors.
I could be mistaken, but I think the capacitors in this bakelite block are somehow related to the tone control.
I've got my schematic and service information from Chuck Schwark and there's no mention of any change.
I guess my question is, should I go with what the schematic says and install some .01 and .006 capacitors or install what the part number on my actual bakelite block calls for, two .015 capacitors?
Thanks a lot for your help.
Tom
Posts: 41
Threads: 12
Joined: Jan 2012
City: Cape Cod, MA
If you have a way to check caps, you could always take a reading of the bakelite caps and see what they are so you can verify what you have.... assuming they are still good. Was the radio functioning when you started?
Posts: 205
Threads: 6
Joined: Jun 2006
City: Moundsville
State, Province, Country: WV
Looks like the P/N was a misprint on the parts list.
Schematic also shows it as a dual .015.
Carl
Northern Panhandle, WV
Posts: 120
Threads: 10
Joined: Jul 2011
City: Glendale, CA
Raydog and Carl, Thanks a lot for the quick answers.
Raydog, I don't really have a way to check the capacitors in the block and no, this radio wasn't working when I got it. I still haven't plugged it in to try it. I probably could now as I've already replaced all the electrolytic and almost all of the paper and bakelite block capacitors.
Carl, I did notice the schematic shows two .015 capacitors for # 71 so I'm inclined to consider the bakelite block (part 3793-DU) that I've actually got in my radio as being correct. That bakelite block uses two .015 capacitors.
Thanks again,
Tom
Posts: 2,128
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2008
City: Merrick, Long Island, NY
Couldn't be a show stopper either way if you can't find better information.
Posts: 761
Threads: 56
Joined: Jul 2013
City: Kentucky
I'd go with the two .015 caps. The chances of them messing up the printed parts list are a lot higher than them actually putting the wrong caps inside the bakelite block, or installing the wrong block at the factory.
The artist formerly known as Puhpow! 8)
Posts: 2,128
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2008
City: Merrick, Long Island, NY
Agree, Follow schematic. In any case as suggested before certainly not harmful.
Posts: 120
Threads: 10
Joined: Jul 2011
City: Glendale, CA
PuhPow and Codefox1,
Thanks a lot for the advice. I plan on following your advice by installing two .015 caps in this block.
Tom
Posts: 120
Threads: 10
Joined: Jul 2011
City: Glendale, CA
Hi,
I am doing a followup on my radio to let you all know where I'm at.
I did replace the two capacitors in the bakelite block (part #71). The interesting thing is that the two capacitors I removed from this bakelite block have different numbers on them leading me to believe that this block had two different capacitors installed. However, I did go with the schematic information and installed two .015 capacitors in this block.
The good news is that I finally gathered up my courage, plugged in and powered up this radio. It works! I listened to the Dodger game for awhile. The tone control, which, I understand, uses the above mentioned bakelite block, seems to work very well.
I still have to replace the four capacitors in the RF deck and do one more bakelite block, but my radio is now working again for the first time in many years. I'm thrilled, to say the least.
Tom
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
|
I’ve consulted a couple of the books which I got from Jim Koehler, Elements of Radio Servicing (Marcus and Levy, 1947) a...jrblasde — 10:58 PM |
Gloritone 27 Radio
|
Richard, Radiotrope was one of the many nameplates coming out of the Marion, Indiana U.S. Radio and Television Corp plan...Eliot Ness — 10:12 PM |
[split] New member...
|
Oh... That link is gold man! Thank you so much.
I'll see if I can get this thing fixed and will post the results on...HowardWoodard — 08:10 PM |
[split] New member...
|
Gosh. I always re-discovered how to do it, took me 2-3 minutes every time.
Now that I think of it, the c-clip is there b...morzh — 07:17 PM |
38-690 Gill Cloth
|
Yeah, this one is not a chevron pattern.
Ask Mike Katz, if he has something that is similar.morzh — 07:02 PM |
38-690 Gill Cloth
|
Hi Folks,
Is anyone currently selling a good reproduction of the 38-890 grill cloth?
Thanks
Stevetargeteye — 06:57 PM |
[split] New member...
|
@morzh: As you can see from the pics I included, there is no clip where the vernier shaft comes out of the brass coarse ...HowardWoodard — 06:56 PM |
[split] New member...
|
I think where the shaft comes out of the brass piece, there should be a clip.morzh — 06:47 PM |
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
|
Well, you're right but the AVC gets to the control grid through the IF secondary, no direct connection to the control gr...RodB — 06:36 PM |
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
|
Where do I look?
7B7 Suppressor?
Both these radios seem to connect the SG to AVC. Which I am not sure why, but then ...morzh — 06:27 PM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently 5637 online users. [Complete List] » 1 Member(s) | 5636 Guest(s)
|
|
|

|