Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 46-250 code 125?
#1

Looking for advice.

I'm working on what I believe is a Philco 46-250 Code 125. That's whats on the cabinet label and the chassis. The schematics I found online are labeled as such. A couple of the tubes didn't match the schematic, but I understand that wasn't unusual post-war and the the rectifier and output tubes were replaced with equivalent tubes with different bases.

BUT there are other big differences when I looked under the chassis.

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/nsYVQIZ.jpg]

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/c9FjnqE.jpg]

The terminal strip the top arrow points at doesn't exist in the schematics I have. And while the schematics called for a twin 20 mfd filter cap, the radio I have had ENTIRELY different values. The Twin cap was a 50(red)/30(blue) and there was an entirely different (and unlisted) cap between the two arrows (a 40 mfd from the #1 pin of the 7C6 to the terminal strip.

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/hOdoCJj.jpg]

I'm sort of at a loss here......
#2

Are you sure you have the correct schematic? I would move the electrolytics somewhere less crowded if possible and put them on a terminal strip if you can. That chassis looks a bit crowded.
#3

Hi,
One of the reasons for the discrepancy in the diagram regarding the filters is the old version used a dynamic spkr were your set has a pm spkr. W/o the field coil the power requires more capacitance to remove the 60cy hum. You'll rarely see 50/30mf cap in a set w/a dynamic spkr unless in it a replacement w/what was on hand at the time.  Go with a pair of 47mf@160v. The blue beaver cap is a replacement from back in the '60s, remove, dispose, and ignore.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 60
Yes, standard alignment procedure. I can get the minuscule tone to vary when adjusting the trimmers. But you almost have...Radios1340 — 01:40 PM
A Marconi model 86
An imposing-looking radio, for sure.morzh — 12:43 PM
Philco model 60
Model 60 struck again :lol: Welcome to the Phorum! Above is the article on Model 60. Could be of some use. Now...morzh — 12:38 PM
A Marconi model 86
Ooh, very nice!jrblasde — 12:19 PM
A Marconi model 86
I am picking up this radio today. The seller tells me it is all there and working.including the tuning eye. It has 13 tu...Dan Walker — 12:07 PM
Philco model 60
Hi guys! I’m a new member here but have been using your resources for quite some time. Hopefully I can get some help wit...Radios1340 — 11:52 AM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Milkjug plastic?morzh — 09:36 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Yep. 'Cause when I heard "buibble" I immediately thought of this and started wondering how this poly...morzh — 09:33 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Blister Pack, that's what I was trying to remember!RodB — 09:29 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
In the packaging biz we refer to the package as a clamshell or blister pack if on a cardboard. So we are using the packa...Paul Philco322 — 08:13 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4745 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 4742 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>