Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

37-630T Volume Control
#1

The schematic shows this radio using a 2 megohm volume control with a 1 meg center tap. I measure the resistance between the two outer lugs and I see 3 megohms on my meter. When I measure between the center and an outer lug I see 1.5 megohms and it goees down to .7 meg with the control all the way clockwise (full volume) position.
is this poteniometer ok ?  While cleaning the track I noticed one spot that appears rough while the remainder is smooth.
#2

With the shaft facing towards you and the 3 closest terminals pointing downward. Connect your ohm meter to the two terminals to the left. With the shaft turned all the way ccw you should read pretty close to 0 ohms (shorted). This is typically were most of the wear happens and is the failing point. Turn the shaft cw so it is in the half way position and you should read about 10% of the total resistance in your case 300K. With the shaft turned full cw should read the full resistance of 3M. Best to use an analog meter as worn spots with cause the needle to jump around.

GL

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#3

With the shaft all the way ccw I don't get zero ohms, I'm reading 99 ohms. All the way cw I get 3.1M. On the analog meter the needle moves smoothly. Should I replace this control ?
#4

You almost never get 0 ohm. 99 ohm is very good.

As for 3M i/o 2M, I'd test it befor getting it condemned: it is likely to work.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.




Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>