Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 37-670 Question about candohm resistors
#1

Hi Everyone!

I have recently finished re-capping a Philco 37-670 and I’ve replaced all out of whack resistors. The only thing left to do is to replace the two candohm resistors. My question is what wattage should the new resistors be? I have 5 watt resistors on hand, but should I go up to 10 watts?  Or more?

Thanks for your help!!!!

-Jason
#2

Hi Jason - Are your candohm resistors open? Just curious since it sounds like you've done the recap. I generally leave them if they're working.

I used 25W resistors on my 37-2670 (very similar set). They still get pretty warm so be sure to mount them to the chassis - or in my case I used an aluminum sheet to mount them so that I didn't have to drill additional holes in the chassis. I use lithium grease under them to ensure decent heat conduction.

[Image: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/4966...39c4_c.jpg]
#3

To add, if Candohms aren't open, being wirewound type their value doesn't go far from original.
I keep them unless 1) open, or 2) leaking to the shell (popular failure mode in Zenith TO 7G605) which causes hum and is overall unsafe.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#4

Hi guys!

Thanks for your replies, they’re very helpful! The resistors are still good - their values are pretty dang close to what they should be. I was just afraid to leave them in as I’ve heard that they can short and I’m afraid of blowing up the power transformer. But maybe I’ll go ahead and leave them. I have another Philco model and I left the candohms in that one and it works fine.

Thanks again!
-Jason
#5

Here’s a picture of it all re-capped.

Edit: For some reason the picture won’t show up   Icon_wtf




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Well, powering it up would be too good to be true, and I had that feeling. Before I did, I decided to check the coils...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Thanks Chas, sure will give it a look!morzh — 03:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, Lookup  murrayatuptown on ARF. Seems he has a dilemma with surplus field coils. Could get lucky and have what y...Chas — 01:26 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, I have not checked to see if my console has a fuse or not and far as sets go I have early 30s General Motor...radiorich — 11:25 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Ron I forgot, but when you said "phone number", I remembered, caus I usually remember how I act when I need...morzh — 11:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
You have an extensive collection of Philcos, Mike! I’m always excited to see each new one. Agreed on the power supply fu...jrblasde — 10:50 AM
462ron
Hi Mike, that 84 sure looks great. You don’t often see these antique radios with a fuse like yours has. I usually instal...462ron — 10:22 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, Wow ! far as my AK it does work and the cabinet is in nice shape so is my chassis anyway here is a photo of...radiorich — 02:59 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Nice radio, Mike! Here's hoping it was well rebuilt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! GaryGarySP — 12:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Rich yes, this is the way I got it. I have just put it on the table and took it apart. I suspect it even might work,...morzh — 11:31 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3972 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 3971 Guest(s)
Avatar

>