Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

37-116 vs. 38-116 performance?
#1

I was looking over the schematics of both models and noticed that the front end was significantly simplified on the later 38-116 code 125. Most of the short wave band trimmer adjustments were eliminated.

Where each band on the 37-116 had individual adjustments for dial calibration and tracking at both the low and high freq ends of each band, some SW bands on the 38-116 have no antenna or RF trimmer adjustments at all. So, at least on paper the 37-116 front end looks far superior with the ability to optimize dial calibration and sensitivity on all bands.

The 38-116 (125) front end looks like an attempt at cost cutting, both in parts and labor to align. What makes it more puzzling is that they also chose to use this simplified design for the top of the line 38-690.

Does anyone have experience using both models who can comment on how the short wave dial calibration and sensitivity compares between the models? I was considering getting a 38-116, but after seeing the RF section schematic, I am a bit disappointed by the changes from the earlier model.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, Wow ! far as my AK it does work and the cabinet is in nice shape so is my chassis anyway here is a photo of...radiorich — 02:59 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Nice radio, Mike! Here's hoping it was well rebuilt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! GaryGarySP — 12:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Rich yes, this is the way I got it. I have just put it on the table and took it apart. I suspect it even might work,...morzh — 11:31 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello mike, What nice looking radio I have one AK in my collection it's a console I have not started restoring it yet ....radiorich — 11:21 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4616 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 4613 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>