Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 87 Highboy
#1

I am getting ready to rebuild the condenser block and I have a couple of questions. Which would be better to use for the filters, Electrolytes or metalized film capacitors, and at what voltage?
Thanks

Skip
#2

Hi Skip
I did my 87 with 450v electrolytic and I've got a bad one in there now after 8 months of fairly heavy usage. Would go with 630v film jobs. I've got the angry 80 syndrome!!
Terry

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#3

Thanks Terry. I think that is what I will do. I just never have used metalized film capacitors in a filter section without any electrolytic caps.
#4

I used 630 volt film types in my 87 and no problems either.

Chuck
#5

I have never done a Model 87, but I have used the poly caps in a Model 16 and both the old (PP 45s) and new (PP 47s) Model 112s fiilter blocks and have had no issues.
#6

I have my 87 up and running, thanks for all the help on the filter caps. I have not done an alignment yet, I had to take all the trimmers apart and clean all the years of grim out. Even with out an alignment (Neutralization) this radio has some kick to it. I like it, this will be a daily driver soon. Icon_biggrin

I have another question, when I turn the radio off every time I hear a loud pop from the speaker. This happens no matter where the volume is at. Is this normal for this model? If not anything I should look at or anything I can do to stop this loud pop.

Thanks for any help.

Skip
#7

No, It's picking up the arcing from the off-on switch It's normal.
Terry

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#8

That is what I thought but wanted to be sure.

Thanks




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>