Posts: 234
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2008
City: Mission Viejo, CA
Do you know the cross-over parts numbers for the Philco 38-690 volume control, Philco part number 33-5240? They one on my 38-690 has some bad spots, and it has been cleaned, so it would be nice to find a replacement.
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
Hi,
I'll search all the 37/38 Philco dealer parts catalogs for that part
when I get home from work this evening. Prob. in there.
Chuck
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
Looking for the values of the dual-pot volume control on the Model 38-690.
All Philco service bulletins and 1937-40 Philco parts catalogs do not show the resistances
of the two sections. Only the Philco part number: 33-5240.
Seems Philco never published parts values in their 38-690 service bulletin.
Any help appreciated,
Chuck
Posts: 237
Threads: 24
Joined: Dec 2007
City: Gladwin, MI
(12-07-2015, 11:13 PM)Chuck Schwark Wrote: Looking for the values of the dual-pot volume control on the Model 38-690.
All Philco service bulletins and 1937-40 Philco parts catalogs do not show the resistances
of the two sections. Only the Philco part number: 33-5240.
Seems Philco never published parts values in their 38-690 service bulletin.
Any help appreciated,
Chuck
Hi Chuck,
While the parts list does not show the values, they are printed on the schematic as part #75 at 500K and part #76 at 100K.
BTW, keep up the good work. I have your data package for my 38-690 code 125 and it has been invaluable.
Thanks again!
Ed
(This post was last modified: 12-08-2015, 07:16 PM by etech.)
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
Ah, ok. My Philco original schematics do NOT show any parts values. ??
Could be a very early edition maybe. Will have to research.....
Thanks,
Chuck
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
Hi again,
While the parts list and schematic I have does not show the values, they were provided by
another member here on the Phorum.
Part #75 is 500K and part #76 is 100K, for the dual pot.
Chuck
Posts: 237
Threads: 24
Joined: Dec 2007
City: Gladwin, MI
(12-09-2015, 10:20 AM)Chuck Schwark Wrote: Ah, ok. My Philco original schematics do NOT show any parts values. ??
Could be a very early edition maybe. Will have to research.....
Thanks,
Chuck
Hi Chuck,
I took the information from the schematic you sent me as part of my packet. It is marked "38-690 Code 125 Figure 1". On the back side of this page is the alignment page and the chassis pictorial page.
Best regards,
Ed
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
Hmmmm....time to retire. (sigh)
Posts: 2,573
Threads: 337
Joined: Jun 2013
City: lawrenceville nj
retire
na you just need a few martini`s to start the day. you`ll be fine
[Image: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c...ghting.jpg]
Some day, and that day may never come, I will call upon you to do a service for me. But until that day, accept this justice as a gift
mafiamen2
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
Not with those 1/2 filled glasses I wouldn't!
AND, they're not chilled!!!
Posts: 236
Threads: 43
Joined: Oct 2010
City: Atlantic Highlands, NJ
Hi Guys,
Did you ever get a good cross over part no. for the volume control? My 690 seems to be bad at the low vol section. I'd like to replace it if I can find a suitable part.
Steve
Posts: 16,312
Threads: 569
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
Steve
have you tried to ask Mark Oppat?
People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
91H Code 126 Restore
|
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM |
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
|
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct.
So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM |
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
|
Arran
Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM |
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
|
Mike;
I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM |
91H Code 126 Restore
|
Thanks Arran,
I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM |
91H Code 126 Restore
|
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means? I haven't traced it out yet.
An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM |
91H Code 126 Restore
|
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM |
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
|
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done.
I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM |
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
|
Mike;
As I was saying it doesn't look like they used much of a bobbin for the field coil, not like a Magnavox one wou...Arran — 05:49 PM |
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
|
This AK84 was bought, I think, last fall.
For a whopping $100.
It has been, according to the seller, restored.
As I go ...morzh — 05:48 PM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently no members online. |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00d17/00d175793acc78e93ba4255d4ab3e9188a10e078" alt=">"
|