38-3 Chassis in a 38-1 cabinet?
Posts: 751
Threads: 91
Joined: Nov 2015
City: Jonesboro
State, Province, Country: AR
Here's a puzzler. This was just shared in the Antique Radios Facebook Group. The cabinet is a 38-1XX. But the chassis and cabinet label are for a 38-3XX. I'd wager by the evidence in the pics, that it came out of the factory this way. Any ideas, anyone?
https://omaha.craigslist.org/atq/5767389098.html
Blessings,
Jeff W.
Jonesboro, Arkansas
http://jeffsradios.weebly.com
God loves you as you are, not as you should be, because none of us are as we should be. - Brennan Manning
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
If you want my guess, and it is only a guess because the principals involved are dead...and dead men tell no tales...and this sort of thing was not documented...
I would say that the 1938 selling season neared an end, the 1939 models were waiting in the wings, and Philco had one - or a few - 38-1 cabinets and 38-3 chassis left over.
So...they created some Phactory Phranken-Philcos utilizing the mismatched cabinets and chassis and sent them out the door to be sold.
It wouldn't be the first time they did that. I have a 200X cabinet with a 201 chassis, and it has the factory stickers inside the cabinet indicating it as a 201. One was stuck over an original 200X sticker where the "MODEL 200X" still shows.
There are other examples of Philco doing this sort of thing, some of which have been documented here in the Phorum.
Now, if that cabinet didn't have a 38-3 tube layout sticker, I would have said that it was mismatched by some "collector." But with the factory tube layout sticker indicating it as a 38-3 points to this having been done at the factory.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 751
Threads: 91
Joined: Nov 2015
City: Jonesboro
State, Province, Country: AR
I kind of figured It was something like a Phranken-Philco, based on the pictorial evidence. Thanks for that little gold nugget piece of historical info, Ron. Something like this wouldn't particularly raise the value or make it any more collectible would it?
Blessings,
Jeff W.
Jonesboro, Arkansas
http://jeffsradios.weebly.com
God loves you as you are, not as you should be, because none of us are as we should be. - Brennan Manning
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Not really, in my observations. It comes down to being...another console that most collectors do not want because they take up so much room.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 751
Threads: 91
Joined: Nov 2015
City: Jonesboro
State, Province, Country: AR
Yup, I hear you on that. I have 5 consoles, and I plan on selling 2. The 38-1 I have is a keeper, as well as the 95 Lowboy and 41-605P, with the record changer intact. The 38-1 has a 12-tube chassis, and sounds great! The 38-3 I know only had a 9 tube chassis, so in that sense, I think that radio in the ad has an inferior chassis in an otherwise really nice cabinet.
Blessings,
Jeff W.
Jonesboro, Arkansas
http://jeffsradios.weebly.com
God loves you as you are, not as you should be, because none of us are as we should be. - Brennan Manning
Posts: 4,816
Threads: 54
Joined: Sep 2008
City: Sandwick, BC, CA
Kirk;
In terms of the power output stages the 38-3 would be inferior to the 38-1, since the 38-3 employs that goofy screen grid inversion setup Philco liked to use, I other then the "magnetic tuning" (or AFC) feature of the 38-1 I don't think that there would be much difference in the front end. Since the 38-1 was a more expensive set then a 38-3 that may explain why they at some point ended up with left over 38-1 cabinets, or ran short of 38-3 cabinets one day back in 1938.
Regards
Arran
(This post was last modified: 09-09-2016, 03:29 AM by Arran.)
Posts: 751
Threads: 91
Joined: Nov 2015
City: Jonesboro
State, Province, Country: AR
Hey Arran, I think you got me confused with Kirk (old restorer). This is Jeff W. ![Icon_biggrin Icon_biggrin](https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif) . But yes, I see where the 38-1 would be costlier, and not sell as many. That would be another reason to have leftover cabinets. The 38-1 did have push-pull output.
Blessings,
Jeff W.
Jonesboro, Arkansas
http://jeffsradios.weebly.com
God loves you as you are, not as you should be, because none of us are as we should be. - Brennan Manning
Posts: 4,816
Threads: 54
Joined: Sep 2008
City: Sandwick, BC, CA
(09-09-2016, 11:20 AM)PhilcoPhan1936 Wrote: Hey Arran, I think you got me confused with Kirk (old restorer). This is Jeff W. . But yes, I see where the 38-1 would be costlier, and not sell as many. That would be another reason to have leftover cabinets. The 38-1 did have push-pull output.
Sorry Jeff;
I thought that Kirk replied to this thread saying that he had a 38-1. Actaully both the 38-3 and 38-1 have a push pull power output stage, but the 38-3 uses a different circuit, actually a simplified and cheaper circuit (Philco called it screen grid inversion) that only requires the two power output tubes and a first audio tube, there is no audio interstage transformer or a phase inverter/splitter tube. Philco used this in a number of models, but probably most prolifically in the early 1940s in their 40-180, 41-280, 42-380 and related models. Some say that the sets that use a proper phase inverter setup have a fuller sound, I don't know is that is true but they do have more output power.
Regards
Arran
Posts: 2,031
Threads: 367
Joined: Jun 2010
City: Dover, OH
Like Ron said, definitely examples of Phactory Phrankens out there. I have one, possibly two in my collection. That odd model 19 or 17 (need to get it out again) and my model 30 in the earlier version lowboy cabinet.
No matter where you go, there you are.
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
|
Gary
I in fact did, on a 38-14, I think, where I had a speaker with the dead coil.
Well...it kinda worked. Kinda, be...morzh — 10:38 PM |
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
|
Mike, what ever happened to that plan you had to try using a rare earth magnet to magnetize the pole? This looks like a...GarySP — 10:25 PM |
RCA T62 is playing.....
|
Beautiful set.morzh — 09:07 PM |
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
|
Well....here it is.
The green stuff. Unfortunately, probably penetrates deep.
I opened the top layer and saw that:
...morzh — 08:58 PM |
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
|
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
Really nice workmanship!!! Top of the chassis looks great.
Sorry about the long winded e...MrFixr55 — 08:09 PM |
Philco 40-120C Restoration
|
Thank you for your reply. I will check voltages on the other tubes, look at resistor 23 and cap 25, etc. If all else fai...bluecap — 07:58 PM |
RCA T62 is playing.....
|
Nice looking set great save. DavidDavid — 07:48 PM |
Philco 89 indicator light.
|
Hello Jim, I have done several 89s. The trick is to move the drum in or out on it's shaft. You will need to loosen a set...dconant — 07:36 PM |
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
|
MrFixr
Yes, it is my plan to go with 45rpm spider if I go that far.
No, the pole was not left-handed as I unscrewed ...morzh — 07:14 PM |
Philco 40-120C Restoration
|
Change the tube. Check the tube's bias network.
Are any other tubes experience the drop or just this?`
Is resistor 23 OK...morzh — 07:09 PM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently no members online. |
|
![>](https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/bootbb/asb/right_arrow.png)
|