Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

16B volume control potentiometer
#1

I'm sure this has come up before but I can't find it anywhere, I'm looking for a replacement volume pot for my 16B, part # 33-5013 any info on what new pot to get would be helpful.  I'm finding conflicting info on values. Thanks.
#2

I suggest you try Mark Oppat at: http://www.oldradioparts.net

He has a huge selection of controls and will know the right one to use.

Jon
#3

Okay as far as I can tell the 16's started out with a 350,000 ohm pot with a tap at 30,000. that was changed at one time to a 2m with an unspecified tap. Nothing at radio daze list a tap and antique radio supply looks like all guitar stuff.
#4

http://www.oldradioparts.com/potindex.txt

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#5

Do you have 350K or 2M part? There were changes. I got mine from Mark.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#6

According to the 1946 IRC Volume Control Replacement Manual:

Part #33-5013 is 350K (75K tap). IRC equivalent D18-137X.

Part #33-5022 is 2M (500K tap). IRC equivalent D13-139X.

I also got a replacement from Mark Oppat.
#7

I have seen 2 different chassis in 16B Cathedral Radios
4 band and the 5 Band which is more common in the 16B

Not sure if VC are the same

Bob T
#8

(03-19-2017, 11:57 PM)Nathan Slingerland Wrote:  According to the 1946 IRC Volume Control Replacement Manual:

Part #33-5013 is 350K (75K tap). IRC equivalent D18-137X.

Part #33-5022 is 2M (500K tap). IRC equivalent D13-139X.

I also got a replacement from Mark Oppat.

[i] I have the 33-5013, I couldn't find anything on it. I opened it up and it looks great, I pulled the one out of my 16X and apparently the pots not the problem. Both work but I'm getting less than half the volume I should at max.[/i]




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 60
Yes, Mark belongs to the same Michigan Antique Radio Club that I do. I suspect that the oscillator coil is in need of a ...Radios1340 — 03:10 PM
A Marconi model 86
Yeah. I am dreading the thought of what to do with all my consoles when I will no longer be able to move them around. I...morzh — 02:51 PM
1947 Silvertone 7086 Wire Recorder/Phono/Radio on YouTube
Cool gadget, Buzz. I took me a couple of second to undestand that that oscillating thing makes the wire to spool correc...morzh — 02:50 PM
A Marconi model 86
My back hurts already, you could build a house with all the wood. PaulPaul Philco322 — 02:49 PM
1947 Silvertone 7086 Wire Recorder/Phono/Radio on YouTube
Part 4 of this series now uploaded link below to anyone interested Buzz — 02:39 PM
Philco model 60
Welcome to the Phorum, Radios1340!  The oscillator coil on the 60 is a common culprit.  I just bought a 60B (June 1934) ...GarySP — 02:33 PM
Philco model 60
Yes, standard alignment procedure. I can get the minuscule tone to vary when adjusting the trimmers. But you almost have...Radios1340 — 01:40 PM
A Marconi model 86
An imposing-looking radio, for sure.morzh — 12:43 PM
Philco model 60
Model 60 struck again :lol: Welcome to the Phorum! Above is the article on Model 60. Could be of some use. Now...morzh — 12:38 PM
A Marconi model 86
Ooh, very nice!jrblasde — 12:19 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 6363 online users. [Complete List]
» 4 Member(s) | 6359 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatarAvatar

>