Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

FStephenMasek's Philco 112 chassis restoration
#1

I found this one just a few miles from our house. Unfortunately, the top veneer had been destroyed by a house plant, and somebody had hacked-in a cheap PM speaker. It was sold as non-working. Somebody had also-hacked-in new capacitors without disconnecting the old ones in the bakelite blocks.
[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...0found.jpg]

The wirewound resistor was bad. After I replaced it, I think I found the problem at one terminal, but the nice new replacement is in place. [Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...sistor.jpg]

I disconnected and labeled the wires to the capacitor black can. Somebody had soldered a terminal strip to one of the positions for the junction of two resistors, so I eliminated it. Be careful, the numbered terminal positions of the schematic and those in the under-chassis pictorial diagram do not match, except that terminal #4 is the same on both. I mounted a terminal strip to hold the new 6.8 MFD electrolytic capacitors under the former position of the long-gone can capacitors. I also mounted a fuse holder, as it seems like a good idea to have a fuse on any radios with a power transformer.

[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...marked.jpg]

The can came apart with ease. The metal ring was just pressed onto the end of the can.
[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...20open.jpg]

The terminal board with the new capacitors soldered to the appropriate terminals. I only had one 0.47 capacitor in my stock, so made the other two replacements for the 0.5MFD units by paralleling 0.22 and 0.3 MFD capacitors.

[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...%20can.jpg]

The power switch tested as open. I removed it and sprayed some contact cleaner into the gaps, then worked the switch.

[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...switch.jpg]

This is an easy to restore chassis. I simply had to unsolder four wires and clip the dial light wires, then remove five screws to remove the gang capacitor assembly, complete with the drive mechanism. This will make cleaning and painting the chassis much easier.

[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...emoved.jpg]

Web site: http://www.masekconsulting.net
Radio Photos: http://www.photobucket.com - album id FStephenMasek
#2

I hesitated before disassembling the tuning gang, but that is the best way to paint the housing, and it was easy to dismantle:

[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...embled.jpg]

I used abrasives and Naval Jelley, then the chrome paint I think I first used on the chassis for our Crosley grandfather clock radio. I ran out of daylight and energy, so the base chassis still needs to be cleaned.

[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...ainted.jpg]

I also had time to clean and paint the chassis. It looks so good that I may just leave the transformers and choke chrome, rather than going over them with black. I cleaned and painted the aluminum cans, as they were also corroded.

[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...filled.jpg]

Now, she is playing. I need pereform the alignment. The dial is off, and changing the 600 padded does not make much difference.

The tone is best with the control set so that none of the capacitors are in circuit, and is the same for the last two settings. Therefore, I will replace all three capacitors with much smaller value units.

Web site: http://www.masekconsulting.net
Radio Photos: http://www.photobucket.com - album id FStephenMasek
#3

Stephen, I hope you do not mind that I split the chassis portion of your 112 thread into its own thread here in Philco Electronic Restoration.

You can still find the 112 cabinet thread here in Philco Cabinet Restoration. Icon_smile

Great work so far on chassis and cabinet. Icon_thumbup

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#4

That Ace chrome paint certainly worked well on this chassis:

[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...nsihed.jpg]

Yes, I dismantled the tuning gang capacitor to paint the housing.
[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...nished.jpg]

I replaced all of the resistors and all except the mica capacitors. Some of the Philco capacitor blocks had been damaged by the hack who had previously worked on it, so I replaced them with terminal strips:
[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...nished.jpg]

This chassis has a bottom, as it sits on two horizontal boards, not a shelf
[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...nished.jpg]

Web site: http://www.masekconsulting.net
Radio Photos: http://www.photobucket.com - album id FStephenMasek
#5

Any ideas ? It is playing up and down the dial, but with low volume. Please consider the following facts:
1) the voltages at the tube sockets all look good, perhaps a bit high (e.g. 187 on the plate of the 1st RF tube, 275 on the plates of the '47 tubes);
2) Both '47 tubes are good and test the same
3) All of the other tubes have been tested and are at or above the reading showing on the roll chart of my Hickok
4) The plate voltage at the 1st Audio Tube is just 89. Bypassing Resistor Number 46 increases it to 138V, but with no increase in volume.
5) Jumping the volume control makes no difference from setting the volume control at maximum
6) All fixed capacitors, except a few mica units which test properly, were replaced
7) The audio inter-stage transformer primary measures something in the 4.5K range, and the secondary something like 5.5K ohms.

It took me too long to finally determine that one of the capacitors numbered 25 on the schematic was missing. It only worked at the low end of the dial, and RF alignment was impossible. Both number 25 were originally metal cans, long gone from this chassis.

By the way, the schematic notes that there are two capacitors numbered 34, but that is incorrect.

Web site: http://www.masekconsulting.net
Radio Photos: http://www.photobucket.com - album id FStephenMasek
#6

Nice job on the chassis. On the #34 capacitor. The last page on NA site shows a part # 34 as Bypass condenser .5 MFD. Two used. This is for chassis with serial # above 174,001.
#7

The secondary of the third IF transformer was open! Fortunately, I had a NOS Philco 45-6365 Universal IF Transformer in stock, so installed it. It now works properly.

The finished chassis bottom, with the cover off
[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...nished.jpg]

Detail of the new IF transformer. Since the new transformer has internal trimmers, I removed the original trimmer for the 3rd IF primary.
[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...d%20IF.jpg]

The new transformer atop the chassis. This is probably exactly the repair which would have been made if somebody had taken this radio to a Philco repair shop a few decades ago.
[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...d%20IF.jpg]

The old IF transformer. Both wires to the secondary looked good, and I did not see any external signs of distress, although a spider had lived there.
[Image: http://i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj77/...d%20IF.jpg]

Web site: http://www.masekconsulting.net
Radio Photos: http://www.photobucket.com - album id FStephenMasek




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>