Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 37-660 Replacement Output Transformer
#1

I need to replace the output transformer in a 37-660 I am repairing. I measured the voice coil resistance as 1.2 ohms, so I assume the impedance is about 2 ohms. The tube manual says I need a load impedance of 10K ohms.  Maximum plate current 80ma (from tube manual) and output power 10 watts (from Riders).

I have a NOS Utah 5999 universal output transformer in stock. It is about the same physical size as the original. Searches online say it is rated at 12 watts (PTOP says 8 watts).  But I have not found any sources for the maximum DC plate current or impedance ratios available (but those can be measured at 400Hz). I suppose that a Hammond 125E would be a better choice since it is rated at 15 watts and 80ma maximum plate current.  But it is HUGE and also pricey. Any advice? Other alternatives? Thanks.
#2

I would certainly give the Utah transformer a try. If it is rated at 12 Watts and the same physical size as the original it should be fine. Plate current rating should not be of too much concern as it is a push pull output stage and there is not a problem with core saturation since the two plate currents cancel the static magnetic field in the core.

You can also measure the winding DC resistance of the Utah and see how it compares with the original if you are worried about the DC drop due to the winding resistance. You can calculate the impedance transformation by measuring the turns ratio from primary to secondary.
#3

Thanks. According to Riders, the 37-660 transformer measures 700 ohms total. My original is open, unfortunately. The Utah 5999 measures 419 ohms total. I do not know what that implies. Perhaps the original has higher inductance, and thus perhaps more bass or less distortion. The owner just wants it to work, so I guess I should not worry.  I plan on using 10000 ohms for the plate load (6F6 push-pull pentode) and 2 ohms for the secondary (measures 1.2 ohms DC). So I am looking for a ratio of about 70:1 I suppose. I use my old HP200A audio generator to drive the primary at about 10 volts at 500Hz and look at the voltages on the various taps.




Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>