Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 37-660 Replacement IF Transformer Proposal
#1

The second IF transformer on my Philco 37-660 has an open primary winding. I did some exploratory surgery but the winding appears to have a break somewhere in the inside of the winding. No breaks at the terminals, or anything else obvious (other than some "green" areas). I unwound turns from both ends as far as I could go. The original is for 470kHz. Primary is 12 ohms, and the secondary is 8 ohms and appears to be tapped. I have plenty of 456kHz donors, but only one 470kHz. 

I am wondering if I can get away with using an IF transformer from a Philco 37-34, which is a 6-volt DC set using 2-volt battery tubes. The winding resistances of the 37-34 transformer are virtually the same as my original: primary 11 ohms, secondary 7.5 ohms. The coil and trimmer assembly even fits the original shield EXACTLY and the alignment holes line up. My main worry is that the original secondary (marked 8 ohms) appears to be center tapped. But when I measure the winding resistance at the leads it measures 8 ohms not 4 ohms. And surgery does not indicate a tapped winding.

Just curious if I can get away with this, or if there is some fundamental reason why a battery radio transformer would not work in an AC set.
#2

It should I just concerted a battery set to ac it worked ok.
#3

My best guess is that on the '660 the If transformer tap is to provide a lower impedance source for the detector. I would use it (one from the '34) with the wire connected to the tap moved over the top of the winding. Don't think there is an issue.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>