Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

37-630T Volume Control
#1

The schematic shows this radio using a 2 megohm volume control with a 1 meg center tap. I measure the resistance between the two outer lugs and I see 3 megohms on my meter. When I measure between the center and an outer lug I see 1.5 megohms and it goees down to .7 meg with the control all the way clockwise (full volume) position.
is this poteniometer ok ?  While cleaning the track I noticed one spot that appears rough while the remainder is smooth.
#2

With the shaft facing towards you and the 3 closest terminals pointing downward. Connect your ohm meter to the two terminals to the left. With the shaft turned all the way ccw you should read pretty close to 0 ohms (shorted). This is typically were most of the wear happens and is the failing point. Turn the shaft cw so it is in the half way position and you should read about 10% of the total resistance in your case 300K. With the shaft turned full cw should read the full resistance of 3M. Best to use an analog meter as worn spots with cause the needle to jump around.

GL

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#3

With the shaft all the way ccw I don't get zero ohms, I'm reading 99 ohms. All the way cw I get 3.1M. On the analog meter the needle moves smoothly. Should I replace this control ?
#4

You almost never get 0 ohm. 99 ohm is very good.

As for 3M i/o 2M, I'd test it befor getting it condemned: it is likely to work.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done. I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; As I was saying it doesn't look like they used much of a bobbin for the field coil, not like a Magnavox one wou...Arran — 05:49 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
This AK84 was bought, I think, last fall. For a whopping $100. It has been, according to the seller, restored. As I go ...morzh — 05:48 PM
Philco model 60
Plus I forgot that I have a spare complete Philco FC speaker, that would work perfectly, now that I don’t need it. Got i...Radios1340 — 05:36 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>