Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Balelite block 3793-AM
#1

Hi guys!

Working on a Model 54C, block cap #36 is listed as 3793-Y which was changed later to 3793-AM. Im pretty sure its a .015 rated at 1200v due it being across the output of the 43 tube. 

My question is all the documents I have read is that the terminals of the block cap 1 and 3 is the capacitor.

In the photo, mine is clearly 2 and 3.

Any clarification would be appreciated

Thanks
Larry


Attached Files Image(s)
   
#2

If you are sure where the cap was connected (if the soldering looks factory), and the soldering of the lugs seems authentic, then why even question it: just put a new cap inside the same way it is now, and connect appropriately.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

Sorry I asked

Thanks
Larry
#4

It was a good question to ask and points out the fact that these bakelite blocks are not always wired up the way that the literature says they should be. I also looked up the info in Ray Blintoff's book and he doesn't have the AM block listed but the Y version is indeed shown as lugs 1 & 3.
#5

I ran into the same issue with my Model 60 recently.  I checked that the wiring connections to my bakelite block were at least consistent with the schematic, so I restuffed it the same way with the new capacitor, just as I found it.
#6

i think that even though the two legs come out incorrect,, those looking for authentic or authentic restorations would be "looking" for the "incorrect" wired block.
to wire it to match the schematic is what i would personally do but,, since its wrong,, it kinda makes it right.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done. I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; As I was saying it doesn't look like they used much of a bobbin for the field coil, not like a Magnavox one wou...Arran — 05:49 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
This AK84 was bought, I think, last fall. For a whopping $100. It has been, according to the seller, restored. As I go ...morzh — 05:48 PM
Philco model 60
Plus I forgot that I have a spare complete Philco FC speaker, that would work perfectly, now that I don’t need it. Got i...Radios1340 — 05:36 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>