Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 18 volume pot cleaning??
#1

Hello all, I have my volume/on-off switch apart; part # 33-5024. I had to clean the on/off switch which wasn't working. It is now, with some contact cleaner. What would be the best to use on the carbon volume portion of the switch? Contact cleaner, alcohol, acetone? I heard some chemicals ruin the carbon resistor wafer. Please let me know, thanks!!
#2

No acetone.

Alcohol works fine where you could see the contact and clean it with a swab; else use a clener. Deoxit D series is good.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

I use WD-40. It's pretty mild and leaves a coating over the carbon. With that being said some pots are just worn out cleaning isn't going to restore it's operation.
I've been working on a 39-80 that the control was very noisy and the switch contacts measured open. Took it apart used contact cleaner on the switch and a little WD-40 on the pot. Tested it on the ohm meter and looked good. Installed it and worked great for a couple of days then I couldn't turn the volume down all the way. Checked it over and the ground side of the pot to wiper was about  50K  (should have been about 100 ohms). Basically it's open at the ground side. Have been waiting on Old Radio Parts to get a replacement.

GL

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#4

De-ox-it FADER LUBE . It is in the green labeled can NOT the contact cleaner.

"I just might turn into smoke, but I feel fine"
http://www.russoldradios.com/
#5

Thanks guys!!
#6

sorry,

misread the part where the switch HAS been cleaned and the carbon part is being cleaned.

Yes, what Russ said. Deoxit Green, fader lube.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done. I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; As I was saying it doesn't look like they used much of a bobbin for the field coil, not like a Magnavox one wou...Arran — 05:49 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
This AK84 was bought, I think, last fall. For a whopping $100. It has been, according to the seller, restored. As I go ...morzh — 05:48 PM
Philco model 60
Plus I forgot that I have a spare complete Philco FC speaker, that would work perfectly, now that I don’t need it. Got i...Radios1340 — 05:36 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>