Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 18 oscillator coil rewind
#1

Hello all, I have an open secondary winding on my oscillator coil, item #16 in the parts list with a secondary resistance value of 3.4 ohms. I counted 16 turns of original transformer or magnet wire, which is about the size of a human hair. The smallest transformer wire I have is 33 AWG. When I restring the secondary coil with 16 turns as original, I am measuring 1.2 ohms. So, what is more important here, the resistance value (which I think they used as a measuring reference) or the inductive reactance which is how this coil is actually used? I know the number of turns affects the inductance, but I get the wrong value when checked with a vom. Thoughts?? Thanks!!
#2

Inductance trumps the resistance. The resistance is going to be different as your wire size is larger. If you don't have enough turns it won't oscillate at the low end of the band. Coil is used to couple feedback from the cathode to the grid and is not in a resonant circuit.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#3

So should I go with my rewound coil with 16 turns measuring 1.2 ohms?? Thanks
#4

Forget ohms. Go for the turns. Also if you don't have the proper wire (often gauge 42) I recommend you buy a spool, with 30-s radios comes handy more often than I'd like to see it.
If the coil is not a part of the resonant tank the turns is the only thing that matter.
If it were, than everything would matter, turns, length of winding, thickness etc.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#5

Thanks for the help gents!!!




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello mike, What nice looking radio I have one AK in my collection it's a console I have not started restoring it yet ....radiorich — 11:21 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done. I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; As I was saying it doesn't look like they used much of a bobbin for the field coil, not like a Magnavox one wou...Arran — 05:49 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5578 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 5577 Guest(s)
Avatar

>