Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Equivalent circuit for a split 2Meg pot
#1

I'm restoring a 38-7, and the original 2Mohm volume control/loudness circuit  was replaced by a very cheap non-split pot that is falling apart. I'm embarrassed to be asking this, but I came across a thread somewhere in this forum about an equivalent circuit for the loudness control that could be constructed using two 1 Meg pots.  I've got the pots now, but of course in the meantime I can't find that link.  Can anyone direct me to the thread that showed a simple circuit for the loudness/volume control that was made from 2 coupled 1M pots? 

I'll post an update on how well it works if I can find it again.
Thanks!!
#2

Don't know how that could work but I take it that you have a dual 1m pot on hand? If so it's important to determine the taper (needs to be audio taper). If you don't have one I'd get Mark Opatt a call more than likely he can fix you up with the proper control.

GL

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#3

Audio taper!  Bummer, I got a pair of linears.  I am doing this project to learn about tube radios, and the most effective way to learn is to make mistakes, so I'm learning a lot.  I will get in touch with Mark.

In the meantime I went back and looked at my history to find the circuit.  It was described in the UK Vintage Radio site.  The link to the circuit is  here.  The circuit uses two coupled 1M pots, and provides a pretty nice Bass boost at low volume. And, of course, it uses log pots.  I'll pursue this and let you know how the 38-7 likes it.

https://www.vintage-radio.net/forum/show...p?t=126515

Clif
#4

i stole this quote from ARF , in someones sig if it helps you at all.

“Experience is what you gain when the results aren't what you were expecting”




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 60
Yes I was there. I got some real bargains there. Plus a Zenith 7G605 clipper that I have been trying to find for a fair ...Radios1340 — 01:46 PM
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 6690 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 6689 Guest(s)
Avatar

>