Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco Transformer Cover
#1

I was wondering why Philco has a cover over the transformer on a 40-150 that I am working on?  I removed it and find a regular old transformer in nice shape I might add.  I was wondering if there was any real reason it is there?  I noticed some pictures of this same radio on the internet that show the cover removed and was thinking the thing would run much cooler exposed to the air.  I was surprised how small this transformer looks vs other radios I have worked on with a similar number of tubes.


Attached Files Image(s)
   

73's  Bob
#2

Just a guess, maybe used for extra shielding.
#3

They aren't really stressed all that much, most of the tubes used in the 40-150, 180, etc are 150 ma loctals rather then the usual 300 ma octals everyone else was using at the time, the exceptions being the #41 output tubes and the 84 rectifier, the B+ voltage was on the low side too, only about 180 volts on the power output tubes. Now why did they use that metal box? I don't know, but it obviously didn't hurt anything as most of this series of chassis still have their original power transformers, however the output transformers are usually dead on arrival if they haven't already been replaced.
Regards
Arran
#4

The OP also asked this question on ARF, and someone there speculated that the cover may have been for magnetic/electrostatic shielding.

Sounds reasonable to me, especially given the close proximity of the loop antenna to the transformer. This may be why the console versions didn't have the cover over the transformer - the loop antenna in the consoles was under the chassis, not directly behind it.

But this is another of those questions that can only be fully answered by dead Philco engineers. And dead men tell no tales, nor do they answer any questions.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

Yes some interesting replies,  seems like it was a fairly common practice with other manufactures of that time as well.

73's  Bob




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, Wow ! far as my AK it does work and the cabinet is in nice shape so is my chassis anyway here is a photo of...radiorich — 02:59 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Nice radio, Mike! Here's hoping it was well rebuilt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! GaryGarySP — 12:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Rich yes, this is the way I got it. I have just put it on the table and took it apart. I suspect it even might work,...morzh — 11:31 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello mike, What nice looking radio I have one AK in my collection it's a console I have not started restoring it yet ....radiorich — 11:21 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>