Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

38-4 or 38-5 Tone Switch Functions
#1

http://www.nostalgiaair.org/pagesbymodel...013252.pdf

I would like to know what the 2nd position of the tone switch on a Philco 38-4 or 38-5 is supposed to do. Position 1 is OFF. Position 2 appears to short the volume control tap to ground through a 40K (32K in my radio) resistor. That just lowers the volume in my radio - no apparent affect on the tone. In my radio, the 3rd position appears to be "hi fi", and the 4th and 5th position reduce the treble by various amounts.
#2

I have a 38-3 which has the same four point tone control as the 38-4 and 38-5 according to the 1938 Philco sales catalog (see http://philcoradio.com/phorum/showthread.php?tid=15785).  Position 2 of the switch is "brilliant" for speech; position 3 is "bright" for normal reception of music; position 4 is "mellow" for the first noise-reducing stage; position 5 is "deep" for noise-reducing for distant reception.  I hear very little difference between positions 2 and 3 on mine.  I can't comment on how each of the 4 tone circuits functions based on the schematic.

Larry
#3

Have you guys ever cranked up your sets , way past the bass sector to the point of great loudness and then played with the selector switch between those "non working" settings? (Be careful to keep it out of the deep bass positions during this test, or you might be sorry). I'm willing to bet those work just fine. If they don't, you may have to go in and change out some resistors you may have missed. If I'm not mistaken, my 38-1 has the same switch, and it works 100%, though there is a slight change in tone between positions 2 and 3 when the volume is low, it is very noticeable at higher volume levels.  Icon_biggrin
#4

The 38-3 I have actually belongs to a friend of mine so I haven't cranked it up.  I can tell a difference between positions 3 and 4 and 4 and 5 at normal volume level so I figure it's working.  I did replace resistors that were out of tolerance.




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done. I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; As I was saying it doesn't look like they used much of a bobbin for the field coil, not like a Magnavox one wou...Arran — 05:49 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
This AK84 was bought, I think, last fall. For a whopping $100. It has been, according to the seller, restored. As I go ...morzh — 05:48 PM
Philco model 60
Plus I forgot that I have a spare complete Philco FC speaker, that would work perfectly, now that I don’t need it. Got i...Radios1340 — 05:36 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4513 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 4512 Guest(s)
Avatar

>