Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Problems in a little PT2
#1

I have always assumed that the plates of the stator and rotor of a tuning capacitor should never be shorted. Now in looking for problems on a current PT2 project, I find the oscillator section of the tuning capacitor is shorted. After careful inspection and not locating plates in contact, I back checked a couple other sets I have on the bench and find that they all have shorted oscillator sections.
I must ask, what's up?
#2

It is in parallel with the oscillator coil so appears like it is shorted. You would have to disconnect the wires from it to confirm for sure if it is shorted. I have come across shorted tuning caps when folks try cleaning with steel wool, never ever use steel wool around them.

Gregb
#3

Thanks Gregb
In fact when I disconnected from the coil it did not show short and suspected this was the case but I couldn't explain it to myself.
Larry
#4

lets start with 56.6k ohm value for secondary of 2nd IF transformer measured between 7C6 pin 5 (d1) and high side of volume control.
next I replaced the 40/80 ohm line resistor with 10w wire wounds. in the circuit the 40 measures good while the 80 measures 3.7 ohms.
thoughts please
Larry
#5

Wouldn't worry about the IF coil more than likely the 47K resistor has drifted some but is of little consequence. If I had it apart to replace the rubber wire I'd check and replace. But the 4 ohm/80 ohm resistor is an issue. 5w is ok total dissipation is 1.8w, I generally go X3. Dissipation is less for the 40 ohm (abt 1 w), it's job is to stop the lamp from burning out from the ac inrush.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#6

threads merged 
http://philcoradio.com/phorum/showthread.php?tid=4586
II. Multiple threads on the same subject not allowed.


sam

Some day, and that day may never come, I will call upon you to do a service for me. But until that day, accept this justice as a gift
mafiamen2
#7

lets start with 56.6k ohm value for secondary of 2nd IF transformer measured between 7C6 pin 5 (d1) and high side of volume control.
next I replaced the 40/80 ohm line resistor with 10w wire wounds. in the circuit the 40 measures good while the 80 measures 3.7 ohms.
thoughts please
Larry
#8

Threads merged (again).

Elfiself, please pay attention to Sam's post (#6 above). Thank you.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#9

Thanks for the reply Terry. I have replaced all resistors and caps including the 470k you mentioned in your reply. My concern is the secondary of the 2nd IF is indicated on schm. as 21ohms but is reading 56k ohms. Do you mean the IF transformer wiring could account for such a dramatic increase in resistance and if so should I consider rewiring it?
Larry
#10

My thought is that are several parts INSIDE the 2nd IF transformer. Two fixed caps (probably 100mmfd ea) and a 47K resistor. The 47K is in series w/secondary of the transformer. So if you measure from the diode to the top of the volume control that 47K is in series it adds to the total resistance measured. Typically the coil would be abt 20 ohms or so but perhaps the 47K has drifted up in value.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#11

got it
thanks Terry
So I finally got some sound from the speaker,( found a miss placed 130 ohm resistor on the 50L6) unfortunately its a loud hum not affected by the volume control.
What would be the fun if it just worked?
Larry




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, Lookup  murrayatuptown on ARF. Seems he has a dilemma with surplus field coils. Could get lucky and have what y...Chas — 01:26 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, I have not checked to see if my console has a fuse or not and far as sets go I have early 30s General Motor...radiorich — 11:25 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Ron I forgot, but when you said "phone number", I remembered, caus I usually remember how I act when I need...morzh — 11:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
You have an extensive collection of Philcos, Mike! I’m always excited to see each new one. Agreed on the power supply fu...jrblasde — 10:50 AM
462ron
Hi Mike, that 84 sure looks great. You don’t often see these antique radios with a fuse like yours has. I usually instal...462ron — 10:22 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, Wow ! far as my AK it does work and the cabinet is in nice shape so is my chassis anyway here is a photo of...radiorich — 02:59 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Nice radio, Mike! Here's hoping it was well rebuilt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! GaryGarySP — 12:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Rich yes, this is the way I got it. I have just put it on the table and took it apart. I suspect it even might work,...morzh — 11:31 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello mike, What nice looking radio I have one AK in my collection it's a console I have not started restoring it yet ....radiorich — 11:21 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>