Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

transformer 32-7993 in 39-116 console
#1

Hi all,
Need a little help understanding a circuit connection.  I am restoring a 39-116 console.  The separate filament transformer 32-7993 physically has 2 primary leads and 2 secondary leads.  The transformer is stamped as 32-7993 and is original.  The problem is that the schematic has this transformer as 3 (three) leads for the secondary.  The actual transformer has almost exactly 6 ohms between the two secondary leads that are there which is correct by the schematic but does not have the third lead as shown on the schematic, which is supposed to have less than 0.1 ohms and powers the 2A4 Filament.  What the heck is going on with this transformer and this wacky schematic?.  Examination of the leads inside the transformer's case shows no sign of there ever being a third lead in the secondary.

Thanks for any help
Dean
#2

Here's a link to the schematic so folks can better help you out. Having said that, it looks like the center tap on the secondary is connected to one leg of the primary and that is likely a connection made internally in the transformer.
#3

Looking at the schematic, it appears as if the center secondary connection is also connected to one of the primary wires. Maybe that is done internally. Either that or the schematic is wrong. Do you get any continuity between the primary and the secondary for the 2A4 filament?
#4

Excellent call!  Yes the connection is internal and now fully understood what is going on.  I never considered the possibility of an internal connection.
Thanks so much for your insight and knowledge.

Dean




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Well, powering it up would be too good to be true, and I had that feeling. Before I did, I decided to check the coils...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Thanks Chas, sure will give it a look!morzh — 03:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, Lookup  murrayatuptown on ARF. Seems he has a dilemma with surplus field coils. Could get lucky and have what y...Chas — 01:26 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, I have not checked to see if my console has a fuse or not and far as sets go I have early 30s General Motor...radiorich — 11:25 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Ron I forgot, but when you said "phone number", I remembered, caus I usually remember how I act when I need...morzh — 11:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
You have an extensive collection of Philcos, Mike! I’m always excited to see each new one. Agreed on the power supply fu...jrblasde — 10:50 AM
462ron
Hi Mike, that 84 sure looks great. You don’t often see these antique radios with a fuse like yours has. I usually instal...462ron — 10:22 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, Wow ! far as my AK it does work and the cabinet is in nice shape so is my chassis anyway here is a photo of...radiorich — 02:59 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Nice radio, Mike! Here's hoping it was well rebuilt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! GaryGarySP — 12:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Rich yes, this is the way I got it. I have just put it on the table and took it apart. I suspect it even might work,...morzh — 11:31 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4527 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 4526 Guest(s)
Avatar

>