Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Identifying 1938 resistors
#1

Can anyone provide a positive ID on these resistors?
They came out of my 38-3.
I believe the large one on the right is supposed to be a 7500 ohm and the smaller one on the left should be either 9 k or 32 k; I lean more toward 9 k.
Both of them currently measure at 10.15k and 10.21k respectively.


Attached Files Image(s)
   
#2

I would agree with your analysis! 7.5K and 9K.
#3

Thank you! So the large one is 7.5 k and the smaller is 9k. Wow. They've done a bit of drifting over the decades....
#4

https://philcoradio.com/library/index.ph...t-numbers/

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

Thank you Ron! Very helpful! I'm curious though - why is the larger of the two resistors shown supposed to be 7500 k while the smaller is 9 k?
#6

and even smaller than the 9k is a 32k ohm resistor. It's kind of like wire gauges? The higher the gauge, the smaller the wire? So the higher the ohms, the smaller the resistor?
#7

The physical size of a resistor determines the power handling capability. The large resistor is capable of dissipating much more heat than the small one. It is, undoubtedly, used in the power supply section of the radio to drop the B+ voltage. Such an application may generate 2 to 5 watts. Much more than that and they usually would use a wire wound resistor because of its greater power handling capability. The smaller resistor is probably only capable of dissipating 1/2 watt of heat. You can easily find a 7.5K resistor that is the same size or even smaller physically than the 9K resistor. The amount of power that a resistor must dissipate is determined by the amount current that has to pass through it. That current is determined by the ohm value of the resistor and the voltage drop that occurs across it.
#8

Ok, now I remember. Hearkening back to my 9th grade science class!




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 49-1040
Oh yes, many bumblebees and loktal tubes. The cutout is for the speaker.  Here's a photo from a different set. Bob Andersen — 12:59 AM
Philco 49-1040
Bob; Looks like another "Bumble Bee" special, like my Brand Z T.O radios. Is that section they took out of ...Arran — 12:19 AM
Philco 49-1040
Hello Bob, You are like the home for lost tv's like how people bring pets home ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 12:00 AM
Philco 49-1040
I thought I had an arrangement to restore this set for a customer but his wife said heck no.  Instead, he gave it to me....Bob Andersen — 10:29 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
I kept working on reassembly this week. I wasn’t able to solder for a few days while it was too cold (single digit low t...jrblasde — 09:27 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Well, powering it up would be too good to be true, and I had that feeling. Before I did, I decided to check the coils...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Thanks Chas, sure will give it a look!morzh — 03:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, Lookup  murrayatuptown on ARF. Seems he has a dilemma with surplus field coils. Could get lucky and have what y...Chas — 01:26 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, I have not checked to see if my console has a fuse or not and far as sets go I have early 30s General Motor...radiorich — 11:25 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Ron I forgot, but when you said "phone number", I remembered, caus I usually remember how I act when I need...morzh — 11:12 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>