Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Replacement for .7 to 1 interstage transformer
#1

Had a similar thread, but it wasn’t as specific as this, and therefore got lost. Anyone know a good replacement for this interstage transformer? Has a turns ratio of .7 to 1. It’s in a Sparton 28.

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/lNO85AP.jpg]
#2

It can not be .7 to 1.
Just by the sheer DC resistance, even if accounted for the wire gauge, 700 Ohm to 1 Ohm means huge difference in the number of turns.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

Morzh,

Look at the schematic. Primary at 3580Ω, secondary center-tapped at 2985Ω (or 5970Ω total secondary). equals a turns ratio of actually .599 to one, but close enough to the rated value of .7 to 1. Am I missing something here?
#4

Morzh,

Oh, I see. Your're looking at the output transformer. I'm referring to the input or interstage transformer.
#5

Oh..yes I was looking at the output.

38-116 has a similar one.
Lets' see if Tubes and More has something.
Nope. They have 1:2 and 1:3. Can't see that ratio around.
Maybe someone else can.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#6

I found a 1:1.5 but that was the lowest. Did find a 1:1 but was discontinued.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#7

1:1.5 and 0.7 to 1 are close enough.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#8

It's a Hammond 124D

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#9

Great! Thanks Terry. I'll get a 124D and give it a shot.

Pat




Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
What should I offer?
I am not sure what radio it is, but seems like a 1950 AM/FM set. Or from 1948, possibly one similar to 48-1264. In any ...morzh — 12:44 PM
What should I offer?
I have an opportunity to acquire this radio-phono, but the owner wants me to make an offer. Tried searching images, but...nocusr — 12:29 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
So, I unwound the coil; it is 700 turns of AWG40 wire. I modeled it on a couple of different calculators and I got about...morzh — 12:29 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Ron From the conversation, it was my impression he was a pretty old dude who is looking to place his radios in good h...morzh — 12:16 PM
Philco 49-1040
Yes, and it's surprisingly common for early TVs to be mostly or all original. My thinking is that they were retired ear...Bob Andersen — 11:59 AM
91H Code 126 Restore
Hi Nick, Usually the dashed lines connected to components means the part is a substitute in the circuit for specific ...RodB — 09:42 AM
462ron
Mike when I got to the guy’s house to pick up the set, he gave me a tour of his home and garage. Wow, his living room co...462ron — 09:10 AM
91H Code 126 Restore
I'm pretty sure that the dotted line I circled in an earlier post signifies that it is applicable to the 226 model which...RealRider — 08:05 AM
Philco 49-1040
Hello bob, that underside looks like it is all original ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:07 AM
Philco 49-1040
Oh yes, many bumblebees and loktal tubes. The cutout is for the speaker.  Here's a photo from a different set. Bob Andersen — 12:59 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3815 online users. [Complete List]
» 4 Member(s) | 3811 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatarAvatar

>