Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Model 71 wire wound resistor and missing cap??
#1

Hello all. I have on my Model 71, item #52, the dual wire wound resistor with a burnt out 245 ohm section. Since it is in series with other 1/2 watt resistors, I assume it will be safe to tie in a normal carbon 1/2 watt resistor? I have rewound many oscillator and other types of coils, but am not going to try to find resistive wire and do this resistor. Also my radio appears untouched and is missing item number 55 ( I think, all of these prints are so blurry and hardly legible in the parts ID listing/diagram), 3615-G, a 0.5uF cap. Any thoughts? Thanks!!
#2

Yes it would be safe, and I would recommend removing some of the burnt part, if possible (if not potted.)
Just make sure your power rating is adequate - see what current there is and then triple the rating vs the dissipation.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

The 3615 bakelite block has 0.05uF caps, either 1 or 2 depending on the suffix. You can easily stuff new caps into the block. There are several techniques used to do this. Search the Phorum to read about that.
#4

Thanks Rod- The problem is that cap is missing, it appears like it was never there. I usually re-stuff all my caps especially Bakelites. Thanks.
#5

Got ya. So I checked my. Beitman schematic for this one and I couldn't find part 55 on the parts list. Like you said the list is fuzzy. And I didn't see it on the schematic either.
#6

.docx philco 71 id diagram.docx Size: 811.44 KB  Downloads: 161
#7

Hello. Here is a picture from Beitman's diagrams, you will see my note for the possible number 55, I have "not there" written in. I think number 38 is used instead. I can figure it out but in the other schematic I found on Nostalgia Air's schematic they talk about changes below run number 4; how would I figure that out? Should I apply those changes or not? Thanks!!




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 49-1040
Hello bob, that underside looks like it is all original ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:07 AM
Philco 49-1040
Oh yes, many bumblebees and loktal tubes. The cutout is for the speaker.  Here's a photo from a different set. Bob Andersen — 12:59 AM
Philco 49-1040
Bob; Looks like another "Bumble Bee" special, like my Brand Z T.O radios. Is that section they took out of ...Arran — 12:19 AM
Philco 49-1040
Hello Bob, You are like the home for lost tv's like how people bring pets home ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 12:00 AM
Philco 49-1040
I thought I had an arrangement to restore this set for a customer but his wife said heck no.  Instead, he gave it to me....Bob Andersen — 10:29 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
I kept working on reassembly this week. I wasn’t able to solder for a few days while it was too cold (single digit low t...jrblasde — 09:27 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Well, powering it up would be too good to be true, and I had that feeling. Before I did, I decided to check the coils...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Thanks Chas, sure will give it a look!morzh — 03:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, Lookup  murrayatuptown on ARF. Seems he has a dilemma with surplus field coils. Could get lucky and have what y...Chas — 01:26 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, I have not checked to see if my console has a fuse or not and far as sets go I have early 30s General Motor...radiorich — 11:25 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>