Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Voltage draw on 40-185
#1

I am restoring a 40-185; all the caps and rubber wiring has been replaced; the set has been aligned and plays well with only some minor audio distortion. I have checked the voltages on the tubes and discovered they are about 20 to 30 volts low. I have also found the RF Coupler #13 on the Riders is only reading .5 ohms and should be at 3.5. Would this cause my low voltage? Can I rewind the RF coupler, and if so how to do it and what wire size should is use? If this could not be causing my voltage draw, then what else should I look into.

Thanks

Skip
#2

Hi Skip,
The RF coupler item # 13 will not cause your voltages to be low. Did you replace all the capacitors or just the filters? Make sure the polarity of the filter capacitors are correct. Check the voltage on the control grids of the output tubes, if high, it will cause the output tube to draw too much current and pull the voltage down. If that is the case look at capacitor # 46.
Steve

M R Radios   C M Tubes
#3

Steve thanks for the heads up. I had replaced all the caps and double checked the ground on the e-caps. I did discover a cold solder and a bad new cap. I also discovered I had tied resister #49 to the ground at resister #59 instead of #60. Once i fixed those issues my voltages are right inline.

If I wanted to rewind #13 the RF coupler, what type of wire should I use? I have removed the wax coating and found the break in the wire, but it is so brittle that I can not splice it back together without breaking it in another spot. The radio plays with out the RF coupler in, on BC, have not really tried the SW bands yet, is the RF Coupler needed for the SW bands?

Skip




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done. I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; As I was saying it doesn't look like they used much of a bobbin for the field coil, not like a Magnavox one wou...Arran — 05:49 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
This AK84 was bought, I think, last fall. For a whopping $100. It has been, according to the seller, restored. As I go ...morzh — 05:48 PM
Philco model 60
Plus I forgot that I have a spare complete Philco FC speaker, that would work perfectly, now that I don’t need it. Got i...Radios1340 — 05:36 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>