Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 89 bypass capacitor voltage
#1

I'm working on a Philco 89 (code 123) and I'm ready to replace the 5 bypass capacitors in the metal can under the chassis (part no. 4). They are .05,.05,.09,.09 and .25 uF.

I have some capacitors of those approx values rated at 200V. Can I get away with that voltage? or do I need to get capacitors with a higher voltage?
Thanks,
Mark Icon_problem
#2

Yes and no Icon_smile For #4 and #39 200v would suffice but for the other three you really should use 400v or higher.
#3

Thanks for the help.
One more question, if I may, at the risk of showing my electronic ignorance....
There is a bakelite cap block no. 17 which has two 0.09 caps in it. One is labeled 17 on the circuit diagram while the other is labeled 29. It is unclear to me if I can use my 0.1uF, 200V capacitors to rebuild that block??
Thanks,
Mark
#4

Yes, on both caps. There's minimal voltage on both of those. Without doing math its probably about 20 volts or so. And 0.1 is fine to replace 0.09. Philco did some funny things like noting "99k" resistors instead of 100k because of poor factory lighting. I suspect that their choice of "0.09" was intended to mitigate reading errors between 0.1 and 0.01
#5

Thank you exray. I can continue with my rebuilding now.
Mark
#6

Hi again, Mark.

Next time buy all 630v caps and this will never again be a question! A few cents more but at the price for shipping when you only need onesie-twosies you'll be better off in the long run.
#7

exray Wrote:Hi again, Mark.

Next time buy all 630v caps and this will never again be a question! A few cents more but at the price for shipping when you only need onesie-twosies you'll be better off in the long run.

That's good advice and what I usually do. I happened to run out of my 630V caps and was scrounging through my supplies when I found a bunch of 200V and 250V caps.
That's what prompted the questions along with my limited knowledge of electronics.




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
91H Code 126 Restore
Well I'm making good progress. All the bakelite blocks have been recapped.  I found that using a heat gun and skinny ...RealRider — 02:35 PM
Philco model 60
>>and found that the field coil is bad. Should be 1140 ohms, tests at 1.1k ohms. You have one stringent crit...morzh — 02:07 PM
Philco model 60
Yes I was there. I got some real bargains there. Plus a Zenith 7G605 clipper that I have been trying to find for a fair ...Radios1340 — 01:46 PM
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 7093 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 7092 Guest(s)
Avatar

>