Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco model 43
#1

I just aquired a model 43 and I see that there seems to be two IF`s. One is listed as 450kc and the Philco literature says 460kc. I am not at the point of a IF alignment yet but was wondering which one to use.
#2

Hi

The original Philco service bulletin for Model 43 specifies 450 kc, and a supplement with alignment information for the 43 also specifies 450 kc.

What Philco literature are you referring to that specifies 460 kc? Just curious.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

Hope you figure it out, but in all honesty it probably wouldn't make a difference. As long as everything was peaked in approximately the same range, you schold be good to go. Didn't have no accurate frequency counters in the average shop way back when.
#4

My Philco service bulletin archive also lists 450KC as the IF frequency for the Model 43.

Maybe a typo in a Rider's or Beitman?

Chuck
#5

The Rider's info in Volume III, Philco pages 3-13 and 3-16, also specifies 450 kc.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#6

Actually it does make a difference peaking the IFs at the wrong frequency, I had a set I repaired about two years ago, also a Philco, that had the wrong IF frequency listed on the data sheet it said 460 KC however the IF cans themselves said 455 KC on the side. I tried it one way at 460 KC and then the other at 455 KC and it made a huge difference in performance, it was 455 KC as it turned out.
Regards
Arran
#7

Ron, The literature I was refering to was Philco-Essential Service Data on All Models that lists the IF for model 43 as 460kc. Also the book "Complete Instructions for Adjusting All Philco Receivers" lists the IF as 460kc on page 23. This radio also has a type 44 in the 1st detector and Riders 3-14 says that the 44 is replaced with a type 36 but it doesn`t state that the 1st detector should be changed to a type 36. The power Xformer is a replacement that only puts out 450v plate to plate-about 216 volts at the 1st filter cap [prt. no. 72 ]but I have left it in until all of the repair work it needs is done. I plan to replace it before alignment and that lead to my question about the IF difference as the voltages will be higher when the new Xformer is installed. Thanks, Mike.
#8

Well,I got back to this set and I replaced the power xformer so the plate voltages are close to where they should be{245v vrs 160v}. I hooked up the signal gen. and set it on 450kc and got nothing. I changed it to 460kc and got plenty of signal. I stopped there because the instructions were a bit odd. They want to set the oscillator to 175kc and I think they want you to leave it there when you align the set at 700kc and 1400kc{ the 4th and 8th harmonics}. Why not change the oscillator to 700kc and adjust the 700kc variable cap. for 700kc and do the 1400kc {on both bands} the same way? Thanks,Mike.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
91H Code 126 Restore
Well I'm making good progress. All the bakelite blocks have been recapped.  I found that using a heat gun and skinny ...RealRider — 02:35 PM
Philco model 60
>>and found that the field coil is bad. Should be 1140 ohms, tests at 1.1k ohms. You have one stringent crit...morzh — 02:07 PM
Philco model 60
Yes I was there. I got some real bargains there. Plus a Zenith 7G605 clipper that I have been trying to find for a fair ...Radios1340 — 01:46 PM
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5440 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 5439 Guest(s)
Avatar

>