Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

42-350 good volume & recept with pushbuttons tuner so so
#1

I'm restoring a 42-350 I've recapped and all tubes test strong except the two 7v7's. All tube voltages seem to be within specs. My problem is low volume. After rechecking my recaped connections to make sure I didn't make any mistakes I discovered I have plenty of volume in push button mode. I've tried cleaning the band switch with contact cleaner and tried to scrape the brass where I could to make better connection. It doesn't look corroded.
Is there a way I can eliminate the band switch as my problem? What other problems can be causing this? I feel I have tunnel vision now as I feel the band switch has to be the problem. Can it be the weaK 7v7 tubes? I have another 42-350 with a bad transformer, but guess what? Every tube but the 7V7's.

Thanks in advance.
#2

Hi

I'm studying the 42-350 schematic.

Are you getting normal volume only in pushbutton mode? What about the SW band, is it also weak?

If you are getting normal volume in pushbutton mode, then don't worry about the 7V7 tubes. They are the IF amplifiers and should not have an effect with this problem, which appears to be limited to the front end section.

Scraping the band switch terminals is not a good idea as there is a chance you could damage the switch. Try CAIG DeoxIT instead. Great stuff! Expensive, but worth every penny. It has brought switches and pushbuttons back to life for me that regular "contact cleaners" would not help.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

From my analysis, let's say your "low volume" is on the AM band only. That would point to trimmer (15A).

If it were SW only: capacitor (18 ), trimmer (15B).

But don't start replacing components yet.

Have you aligned the radio? This may be all that it needs.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#4

Volume is better in push button mode, but I feel it could be louder. Definitely louder in push button than tuner. Yes I did an alignment. Didn't try the shortwave. Will have to wait till this afternoon to try your suggestions.
Thanks for the help.
#5

Ok I re-alined, rechecked all voltages shown in schematic they are all within 2 to 3 volts. Looks like only plate voltages shown. Not knowing what to do next I injected a weak audio signal into the grid of 7B5 and got a good strong return from the speaker.
I'm a newbie so please bear with me. I'm thinking now I have a RF or reception problem. Still have better sound/reception on push button than manual tuning. Of course I have both set for the same local station. I checked all Band switch connection that I could find on drawing for position 2 broadcast they all showed continuity in the ohms range. While I was doing this I discovered if I touched the #1 lead of (10) the broadcast aerial trans. reception/ volume increases 100%. But is still lower in manual that push button tune. Push button sounds almost normal with a length of wire attached to this lead. By the way I can only receive 2 stations on SW and they are barely audible. I don't usually give up easy, but there has to be less aggravating hobbies Icon_lol All suggestion and comments welcome.
Thanks
#6

Found 1 bad solder connection from previous repair on band selector wafer C. Reception is identical on push button and manual tuning now. But only static on shortwave. going to concentrate on band selector switch by comparing continuity on each band position with identical spare parts chassis. Will update.
Thanks again.
#7

Good to hear you fixed your AM reception!

Check the SW antenna and oscillator coils for continuity, also.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
91H Code 126 Restore
Well I'm making good progress. All the bakelite blocks have been recapped.  I found that using a heat gun and skinny ...RealRider — 02:35 PM
Philco model 60
>>and found that the field coil is bad. Should be 1140 ohms, tests at 1.1k ohms. You have one stringent crit...morzh — 02:07 PM
Philco model 60
Yes I was there. I got some real bargains there. Plus a Zenith 7G605 clipper that I have been trying to find for a fair ...Radios1340 — 01:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>