1. The PHILCO Phorum
  2. Philco Radio Discussions
  3. Philco Electronic Restoration

Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Threaded Mode
Two More Questions on Philco bakelite caps and values
jerryhawthorne
Phorum Expert
*****
Posts: 1,562
Threads: 56
Joined: Nov 2008
City: Sedona, AZ/Placentia/CA
#1

11-01-2011, 04:36 PM
Working my way through a Philco 19 code 126 and noticed two discrepancies on sealed caps.
1. Cap labeled "4989W" indicated in the Philco workbench reference material as a .09mfd and 200ohm unit, is shown in the code 126 schematic (item 5) as a .09 and 300ohm package. On the code 121 it is shown as a .09 and 200ohm. Go with the 200 ohm?

2. Cap labeled "8174B" indicated in the Philco workbench reference material as a 700pf and .05mfd unit is shown in the code 126 and code 121 schematics (item 8) as a 700pf and .09mfd. Not certain which I should go with on this one. Any suggestions?

Sorry for the "funny face" on item 2, should be an 8 but keeps coming up that way!
Thanks for your help, Jerry
A friend in need is a pest!  Bill Slee ca 1970.
Find
Radioroslyn
Phorum Expert
*****
Posts: 7,294
Threads: 268
Joined: Dec 2009
City: Roslyn Pa
#2

11-01-2011, 11:04 PM
I'd go with the 200 ohm and the 700mmfd and .09/.1
With bypass caps always go larger.
Terry
When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
Find
jerryhawthorne
Phorum Expert
*****
Posts: 1,562
Threads: 56
Joined: Nov 2008
City: Sedona, AZ/Placentia/CA
#3

11-02-2011, 02:07 PM
As usual, thanks for the response Terry. Shall go with the .1 and 200 ohm.
Jerry
A friend in need is a pest!  Bill Slee ca 1970.
Find
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Thread Closed




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Rich yes, this is the way I got it. I have just put it on the table and took it apart. I suspect it even might work,...morzh — 11:31 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello mike, What nice looking radio I have one AK in my collection it's a console I have not started restoring it yet ....radiorich — 11:21 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done. I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5311 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 5310 Guest(s)
Avatar

>
  1. The PHILCO Phorum
  2. Philco Radio Discussions
  3. Philco Electronic Restoration