Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

cap question
#1

I am currently restoring a Philco 18 and one of the bakelites show two caps rated at .00011mf. Should I assume that they are a couple of micas in there and leave them alone? Or should I replace them with a couple of .0001mf styroflex caps that I have. Hopefully the difference in capacitance will be OK. I tried checking the originals but my meter doesn't seem to be sensitive enough to get an accurate reading.

Thanks, Don
#2

Replace them. Sometimes mica caps can be found in the 8035 series bakelite blocks; but in a majority of these blocks I have opened, they had small paper caps inside.

Mica caps can and do go bad, also, so better safe than sorry...

Oh, and yes, 100 pF caps are fine as a replacement for 110 pF. These form part of a pi filter network and do not have to be mica - you can even use ceramic to replace these. However, mica caps in RF circuits must be replaced with mica or NP0 ceramic for stability.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

Thanks for the quick response. These caps look like they are in the 2nd detector and 1st AF circuit. So it looks like I should be Ok with the Stryroflex, or polystyrene caps? It just happens to be what I have on hand. BTW the forum looks great.
#4

Yes, those will be OK in this circuit, assuming they are 100 pF (.0001 uF) and not 1000 pF (.001 uF).

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

Yes they are definitely .0001uf. Thanks




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Rich yes, this is the way I got it. I have just put it on the table and took it apart. I suspect it even might work,...morzh — 11:31 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello mike, What nice looking radio I have one AK in my collection it's a console I have not started restoring it yet ....radiorich — 11:21 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done. I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5442 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 5441 Guest(s)
Avatar

>