Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

RE-Stuffing Model 90 Tone Caps?
#1

I looked through the Philco Radio site and I couldn't find the procedure for re-stuffing the cap block attached to the tone control on my model 90. It's gotta be there somewhere. Does this procedure exist and does anyone know where to find it? I found lots of topics on the 90 tone control but nothing specific to what I need to do.

Thanks,
Pepper

"It's Nice To Be Nice To The Nice"
Major Frank Burns Mash 4077th
#2

Have never done one, but believe it's similar to re-stuffing bakelite block caps.
#3

You know I just jumped into it last night and I believe it's gonna be a piece of cake. It's a small metal can that has ends that can be folded open and the old rectangle of tar and caps just pops out. Of course you have to cut the three (3) cap wires that go the the switch contacts themselves. I'll try to post some pics.

Pepper

"It's Nice To Be Nice To The Nice"
Major Frank Burns Mash 4077th
#4

(03-26-2012, 12:35 PM)Pepperoni Wrote:  You know I just jumped into it last night and I believe it's gonna be a piece of cake. It's a small metal can that has ends that can be folded open and the old rectangle of tar and caps just pops out. Of course you have to cut the three (3) cap wires that go the the switch contacts themselves. I'll try to post some pics.

Pepper

I open the can just enough to let the slug fall out with a heat gun on low. Re-stuff with your fav. caps.

Chuck

#5

I think opening the front of the can may have been easier then opening the ends. I had problems with the slug interfering with the bottom of the wiper. But it still came out easy enough. Here's the pics.

Clean assembly ready for new caps.
[Image: http://speakeasyradios.com/yahoo_site_ad...40_std.jpg]

Caps wired into can. The rubber grommet fit perfectly in the hole so I used it and I also put a piece of insulating material in the bottom of the cans so the caps could rest in peace.
[Image: http://speakeasyradios.com/yahoo_site_ad...28_std.jpg]

Tone control complete.
[Image: http://speakeasyradios.com/yahoo_site_ad...36_std.jpg]

EDIT: Also on this Philco 90... What is the polarity of the 1.0ufd #30 cap? I ask because it's in parallel with a 70K resistor to ground but the other end goes through a 25K resistor, through the 3 section resistor to the CT of the high voltage output which I thought was the most negative part of the radio. So which end goes to chassis ground? + or -? Assuming this is a lytic cap.

Pepper

"It's Nice To Be Nice To The Nice"
Major Frank Burns Mash 4077th
#6

(03-27-2012, 12:22 PM)Pepperoni Wrote:  Also on this Philco 90... What is the polarity of the 1.0ufd #30 cap? I ask because it's in parallel with a 70K resistor to ground but the other end goes through a 25K resistor, through the 3 section resistor to the CT of the high voltage output which I thought was the most negative part of the radio. So which end goes to chassis ground? + or -? Assuming this is a lytic cap.

Got the cap figured out.

Pepper

"It's Nice To Be Nice To The Nice"
Major Frank Burns Mash 4077th
#7





None of these caps are electrolytic, so polarity is not an issue.
One can see all three are metal-film types from the picture.

Chuck


#8

The other (ungrounded) end of the 70K resistor and 1.0 uF capacitor are connected to the screen grid B+ line - the screen grids of the RF, 1st det. & IF tubes. This is positive voltage, so if you use an electrolytic, your + lead should go to this point and the - lead to the can (ground).

It would be better if you use a mylar cap instead of an electrolytic here, but you can use an electrolytic if you wish. If space is a consideration within the can of (30), use two 0.47 uF caps in parallel which adds up to 0.94 uF - close enough to 1 uF.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#9

Thanks guys! Got it.

I pulled the schematic from philcoradio.com on this Philco 90 with all of the component values added. My Philco 90 (single 47 output) has a 250K volume pot in it and the part number 5366 is on the volume control which matches the parts list. But the schematic calls out a .5 meg pot. Is this a discrepancy on the edited schematic or is my volume pot not functioning properly? It seems to be functioning properly with my Fluke 179 hooked up to the CT and each leg but reads 250K across it.

Pepper

"It's Nice To Be Nice To The Nice"
Major Frank Burns Mash 4077th
#10

(03-29-2012, 07:08 PM)Pepperoni Wrote:  Thanks guys! Got it.

I pulled the schematic from philcoradio.com on this Philco 90 with all of the component values added. My Philco 90 (single 47 output) has a 250K volume pot in it and the part number 5366 is on the volume control which matches the parts list. But the schematic calls out a .5 meg pot. Is this a discrepancy on the edited schematic or is my volume pot not functioning properly? It seems to be functioning properly with my Fluke 179 hooked up to the CT and each leg but reads 250K across it.

Pepper

All my Philco Parts Catalogues show the volume pot to be Part No. 5724 for the 1-47 tube version, which is 500,000 or 0.5 meg pot. Part No. 5366 only shows up in my 1945 Parts Catalogue as subbed with p/n 45-5019 (a 1945 version part) with also a value of 0.5 Megohms.

From all this info, it appears that 0.5 meg for the pot is the correct value. The schematic (90 w/1-47) on this site also shows Part No. 20 as 0.5 Meg.

Be sure you are measuring the resistance of the pot from the outer two terminals, not from the each end to the center terminal, which is the wiper.

Regards,
Chuck


#11

As usual Chuck you are thinking more clearly then I. This pot is of the audio taper and not linear taper. Measuring across the two outer terminals Im reading 250K. But read from CT to either outer leg and it's not linear but does go thru 500K. But I still don't understand 250K across the outer terminals.

Pepper

"It's Nice To Be Nice To The Nice"
Major Frank Burns Mash 4077th




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done. I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; As I was saying it doesn't look like they used much of a bobbin for the field coil, not like a Magnavox one wou...Arran — 05:49 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
This AK84 was bought, I think, last fall. For a whopping $100. It has been, according to the seller, restored. As I go ...morzh — 05:48 PM
Philco model 60
Plus I forgot that I have a spare complete Philco FC speaker, that would work perfectly, now that I don’t need it. Got i...Radios1340 — 05:36 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>