Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

BOYS AND THEIR TOYS
#1

Well, I know young boys like to play with their toys(like blocks)--but do men? Sometimes yes, sometimes no. For example my radio restorer seems very hesitant to "play" with the blocks on my Philco 38-690 even after I told him people on the Phorum say they are often bad. He's got my radio playing pretty well from what I can hear over SKYPE but is that good enough? He told me: "IN YOUR RADIO ARE 3 BLACK BLOKS : 32-2752 , 6287 SU, 3793DG". I would appreciate opinions from my learned members before this radio gets shipped to me! Thanks much and hope all have a Happy Easter or Passover.
#2

Sam

There is one block in the upper chassis of the 38-690 that absolutely should NOT be touched! It is part (97), and does not contain any capacitors, but instead a coil which is the set's 10 kc audio filter. Unpot that, and you may destroy that coil. That block is part no. 32-2752.

The other two are conventional bakelite block caps, and should be unpotted and the inside replaced with new caps.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

Those bakelite cap blocks will test your patience, but if I can do them, anyone can. Just takes time.

Here are the 2 links you need to know about:

http://www.philcoradio.com/tech/blocks.htm
http://www.philcorepairbench.com/capbuild.htm
#4

The bakelite block in my 40-190 was the very first thing I did in the re-build. Heck, haven't gotten much farther than that because nice weather's been taking me outside. Bakelite blocks are not complicated critters, but they do require patience.

And a nice handy guide like the two listed above, plus:

http://www.philcorepairbench.com/bblokcap.htm

Which is essentially the same info but with larger pictures. ;)




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done. I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; As I was saying it doesn't look like they used much of a bobbin for the field coil, not like a Magnavox one wou...Arran — 05:49 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
This AK84 was bought, I think, last fall. For a whopping $100. It has been, according to the seller, restored. As I go ...morzh — 05:48 PM
Philco model 60
Plus I forgot that I have a spare complete Philco FC speaker, that would work perfectly, now that I don’t need it. Got i...Radios1340 — 05:36 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4119 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 4118 Guest(s)
Avatar

>