Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

37-610 semi fixed condensors
#1

I just bought one of these and awaiting it's arrival. I see on the schematic #17 and #20 are a 1650uf and a 3500 uf semi fixed condensers. What are these and do I need to replace them? Also is it good practice to change the mica condensers also or let them be?

thanks
Chris
#2

Not sure what you mean by "semi-fixed condenser."

The mica condensers are usually ok, and do not need replacing.
#3

I have never seen that either but that it what it says on the schematic. Was unsure if it just another mica one or not.
#4

They are NOT uF. They are pF (uuF). Big difference.

I would measure them just im case, usually they stayut.
#5

Take a nice clear shot of the RF section when you get the set. These appear to be trimmers, but are not mentioned in the alignment instructions on the ARF scan of the Riders on this set. Agree, probably OK. I'd leave them be until after the restoration is done and see if alignment goes well.

You can get a much better schematic and notes set from Chuck's site
http://www.philcorepairbench.com/schematics.htm
#6

As I look at the diagram it looks like the 1650mmfd cap defiantly will have an effect on the osc fq. The 3500mmfd seem like a pretty large value considering the fq, I'm thinking it's a bypass.
Terry
#7

Codefox nailed it. They have the appearance and construction of trimmer condensers (capacitors), but they are not meant to be adjusted. They were adjusted to a certain value in pF at the factory and were meant to be left alone from then on.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#8

Great thanks guys. Still waiting for radio to be shipped. hope it arrives in one piece!

Chris




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 60
Yes I was there. I got some real bargains there. Plus a Zenith 7G605 clipper that I have been trying to find for a fair ...Radios1340 — 01:46 PM
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 6662 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 6661 Guest(s)
Avatar

>