Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco's octal socket pin removing trick
#1

Philco removed unused tube socket pins in radios like the 1937-38 radios and many more. What is the purpose of removing the pin(s)? It becomes a problem when you want to use a different tube 75 yrs later! I don't do hot-rodding as a general practice but I find I a lot of fun experimenting on my two junkers. Missing pins always require a socket replacement when updating a 6K7 with a 6SG7, a 6Q5 with a 6J7, or any rectifier. (yes, I know the 6Q5 and 6J7 are completely different tubes but they are both detectors.)

Pete AI2V

Pete AI2V
#2

I think part of the plan may have been to save on brass but when it comes to octal tubes Philco had a hate on for metal tubes and prefered ST style glass tubes so in certain caes they may have left at least the #1 pin contact out so a metal tube could not be used. Also rememeber that in 1937-38 even metal octal tubes still had a grid cap, the 6S## tubes seem to have debut in 1939 so on a 6K7G two pins were not needed as anything other then a tie point.
I noticed that Rogers in Canada (Also known at the Canadian Radio Corperation and Rogers-Majestic Corp) did similar things when it came to their 2X3 and 2Y3 rectifier tubes. The 2X3s were diodes rectifiers used in pairs where the filaments were connected in series. The basing is similar to a 5Y3 minus a plate, but they only needed three contacts out of eight on each octal socket and often left the other contacts out. The main reason I can think of was to prevent servicemen from rewiring the socket to accept a more normal 5Y3 or 5Y4 .
Regards
Arran




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>