Philco 71 E IF adjustment instability
Posts: 10
Threads: 4
Joined: Jul 2012
City: New Zealand
Have just joined altho' been restoring radios inside and out for many years.
current project, 71 e chassis C 34468.
Completed circuit restoration including restuffing bakelite cap. cases with 630 v axials, electro cans with 10 uf 450v, and replacing any resistors too far out of tolerance.
Coils all checked ok and set worked across bc band.
Started to align by peaking if's to 260 khz and all went well until the last trimmer, no 4 lh side back - 1st if primary - whitch caused set to oscillate noisily before a peak was reached.
Backing off this trimmer resulted in the set operating ok, but i wonder if this is normal behaviour, any suggestions very welcome.
Posts: 2,128
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2008
City: Merrick, Long Island, NY
Well, always could be usual crap or dust amongst the leaves. Why not loosten it up, blast it out with Deoxit, leave it dry over night and try again. Usual stuff, count how many turns accurately to tighten, write down, ad repeat backwards the nest day. Yo'ull be really close.
Hopes this helps.
(This post was last modified: 07-27-2012, 09:44 PM by codefox1.)
Posts: 10
Threads: 4
Joined: Jul 2012
City: New Zealand
thanks codefox, but trimmer tests out ok. will dig deeper.
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
Might I suggest checking for marginal tubes, and/or an open or shorted IF transformer winding.
Also, if you flushed a mica trimmer with a contact cleaner, like DeOxit, there could be an oily residue that's throwing the capacitance of the trimmer out of spec. Many contact cleaner formulas leave a non-oxidizing film behind when they evaporate. I use DeOxIt at work for contacts only because of this.
Try flushing the mica with denatured alcohol to clear off any oily residue, that's good for metalic contacts in a switch, but bad for a mica trimmer cap.
Been there.
Chuck
Posts: 7,294
Threads: 268
Joined: Dec 2009
City: Roslyn Pa
Good thoughts Chuck. It maybe just the electrical differences in the new parts vs the old. The caps may have the same value of capacitance but the inductance may be a bit different along with wiring layout. Agree with Chuck check all the other stuff to be sure it's working ok and I poses you could beef up the bypass and decoupling parts values.
GL
Terry
Posts: 10
Threads: 4
Joined: Jul 2012
City: New Zealand
Thanks for the suggestions guys,
I ruled out the trimmer by opening it to min. capacitance and bypassing it with a modern trimmer which gave the same instability.
I removed the IF coils, tested them, and used a hot air gun to melt out old wax ( and hopefully moisture ) then melted in some new wax.
Will look at bypassing next.
Tried another ' 36' and '44' - much the same.
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
Also make sure lead dress on the grid and plate wires are not near each other. Push the wire(s) going to the grid close as possible to the chassis and be sure the plate lead(s) are as far away as possible from the grid leads and socket terminal.
Chuck
Posts: 10
Threads: 4
Joined: Jul 2012
City: New Zealand
Checked lead dress - ok - most of wiring is still original.
Re-did alignment starting with 2nd IF feeding sig. gen. at 260 khz via 0.1 cap to grid cap of '44' which peaked ok, then moved gen. to grid cap of '36'. This time adj. of either trimmer resulted in osc. while approaching peak.
This behaviour reminded me of the old regenerative sets where max. sensitivity was just before osc.
With a stable setting of these two trimmers set goes quite well, but i'm still puzzled by this behaviour.
Also i wonder why there are blanking plates covering the two IF primary trimmer access holes on the rear of the chassis, - were these settings more critical and not normally touched ?
Posts: 1,407
Threads: 72
Joined: Oct 2007
City: Linn Creek, MO
Some of the IF trimmers that have B+ on them, the covers are there to prevent someone from getting an accidental shock. When adjusting these trimmers you should wrap your screwdriver with tape so to not short the B+ to the chassis.
Steve
M R Radios C M Tubes
(This post was last modified: 08-05-2012, 12:17 PM by Steve Davis.)
Posts: 2,128
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2008
City: Merrick, Long Island, NY
Agree, use a nylon diddle stick, and if you don't have one, beg a dry chopsick from your kitchen and file it to fit slot. If you are using an ancient signal generator like most of us, a really cheap modern frequency counter should join you bench. Check without modulation, and not hhooked up to set, rehook it or use 20 turns of anything on a TP roll near the set, you probably know the drill. Turn on modulation and let us know whaty happens. Yes, hypercritical adjustments need to be very slightly be detuned, espedially with over performing tubes, which are becoming somewhare rare nowadays as are we.
Posts: 10
Threads: 4
Joined: Jul 2012
City: New Zealand
Yes, the protection from HT makes sense. The trimmer adj. are by way of hex nuts not screw slots, and the tool i use for these is a length of stiff plastic tube that has been softened at the end with a heat gun and molded over the nut, so insulation from HT and effect of metal eliminatsd.
For slotted screws i use strip of fiberglass PCB filed to shape, with copper removed of course.
Signal generators are, ' Windsor mod. 66 a ' restored, and ' AVO MK 3'. Frequency counter is a' Leader' digital.
Amazingly, some of the tubes in this radio still have stickers on them stating they were tested ( by a radio shop ?) in 1938 and found good. They still seem to be good now!
pcb
Posts: 2,128
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2008
City: Merrick, Long Island, NY
Good, so just follow the volts.
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
91H Code 126 Restore
|
Well I'm making good progress.
All the bakelite blocks have been recapped. I found that using a heat gun and skinny ...RealRider — 02:35 PM |
Philco model 60
|
>>and found that the field coil is bad. Should be 1140 ohms, tests at 1.1k ohms.
You have one stringent crit...morzh — 02:07 PM |
Philco model 60
|
Yes I was there. I got some real bargains there. Plus a Zenith 7G605 clipper that I have been trying to find for a fair ...Radios1340 — 01:46 PM |
The speaker table error?
|
G 10-1/2" 65, 76, 87, 95
Push-Pull 45's
2766
0.7
550
3200
H 10-1/2" 77, 96
Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM |
A Marconi model 86
|
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s.
This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM |
A Marconi model 86
|
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM |
A Marconi model 86
|
>>What a behemoth!
A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM |
Philco 70 antenna lead
|
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM |
A Marconi model 86
|
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth! I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example! Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM |
A Marconi model 86
|
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently 6833 online users. [Complete List] » 1 Member(s) | 6832 Guest(s)
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00d17/00d175793acc78e93ba4255d4ab3e9188a10e078" alt=">"
|