Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Resistor question
#1

My Philco 18 has a resistor that the schematic and the parts list says is 32K. Out of the circuit, it measures almost dead-on 20K. It's #61. Is this possible? If possible, would a 2 watt replacement be OK?
#2

What are the body-end-dot colors of the original resistor? 32K would be body= orange end= red and dot= orange. If not, it may be a replacement or modification.
#3

Quote:What are the body-end-dot colors of the original resistor?

Body is orange, end is red and no dot. But that would normally mean the dot is the same color as the body, right? I had two 20K resistors that read 15K and 14K. Their markings were correct. I not used to seeing them go down in value.
#4

It is rare that they will go down in value. I've only seen a couple that way. Replace it with a modern 33K (I prefer flameproof). I think the largest resistors in these radios that are not wirewound are 3W, and those are the very large dogbones. Most are half watt. 2W replacement may be overkill, but will work.
#5

After looking at Chuck's site about Philco resistors, I'm sure it's a 2 watt. The drop in value seems odd, but all signs point to it.
#6

When and if you can find a parts list most of the B.E.D code carbon resistors used in Philcos were between 1/4 Watt to 3 Watt, depending on the circuit. Contrary to popular belief resistors with a maximum power dissipation of 1/2 Watt was not the floor in terms of those used in old radios, many used 1/4 Watt and even 1/3 Watt resistors if they thought they could get away with it.
If you can find a parts list for a given set that will tell the story, as with now it was all about cost and pinching pennies, if a 1/4 Watt resistor cost them 1 cent less then using a 1/2 Watt then they would use the 1/4 Watt. If you can use six 1/4 Watt resistors in a radio that's 6 cents saved per radio, when you are producing 100,000 or even 1,000,000 radios that's $6000 and $60,000 trimmed off the manufacturing costs. Thanks to some short sighted thinking as to where to use a 1/4 Watt resistor, every Canadian G.E and RCA model made between 1940 and 1946 ends up needing the plate resistor replaced on the 6SQ7 first audio/second detector tube.
Regards
Arran




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>