Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Jackson Bell Question
#1

i got this JB from a co worker the other day it is a nice 6 tube superhet with 3-57's,a 56,33 output and an 80 rectifier tube anyone have an idea of the chassis model number thanks Don


Attached Files Image(s)
   
#2

The 33 is wrong, it's an 2 volt output tube for a battery radio, very likely it was supposed to have a 47 or a 2A5. Somebody probably grabbed a random tube with the same base just to fill an empty socket, or wasn't aware that a 2 volt battery tube was very different from a 2.5 volt AC tube.
Regards
Arran
#3

yup i haven't measured any voltages yet BUT the set has been playing that way since who knows when it was in used daily until a few years ago and plays now with very little ,or no hum!! (i would have thought a 2.5 volt tube would have poped) or HUMM with twice the normal filiment voltage Don
#4

Nice JB, but yeah, the tube line-up sounds wonky with that 33 in there. It'd be nice to see some pictures of the chassis. It might be a more common chassis used in a less common cabinet.

The cabinet doesn't look familiar, but JB was a small west coast company and undocumented models turn up now and then. Looking at the cabinet style makes me think it may have been one of their later (last) sets made. JB is usually pretty good about having the model number stamped on the chassis or engraved on a chassis plate.

I just did a quick scan of Floyd Paul's JB documentation and didn't see a cabinet like yours.

And for anyone who doesn't have a set I highly recommend Los Angeles Radio Manufacturing, The First Twenty Years by Floyd A. Paul. It's a very interesting look at the birthplace of the midget/mantel set:

http://www.antiqueradios.org/paul-bks.html

These have recently been reprinted in a limited edition after being out-of-print and unavailable for years.

John KK4ZLF
Lexington, KY
"illegitimis non carborundum"




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 49-1040
Hello Bob, You are like the home for lost tv's like how people bring pets home ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 12:00 AM
Philco 49-1040
I thought I had an arrangement to restore this set for a customer but his wife said heck no.  Instead, he gave it to me....Bob Andersen — 10:29 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
I kept working on reassembly this week. I wasn’t able to solder for a few days while it was too cold (single digit low t...jrblasde — 09:27 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Well, powering it up would be too good to be true, and I had that feeling. Before I did, I decided to check the coils...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Thanks Chas, sure will give it a look!morzh — 03:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, Lookup  murrayatuptown on ARF. Seems he has a dilemma with surplus field coils. Could get lucky and have what y...Chas — 01:26 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, I have not checked to see if my console has a fuse or not and far as sets go I have early 30s General Motor...radiorich — 11:25 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Ron I forgot, but when you said "phone number", I remembered, caus I usually remember how I act when I need...morzh — 11:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
You have an extensive collection of Philcos, Mike! I’m always excited to see each new one. Agreed on the power supply fu...jrblasde — 10:50 AM
462ron
Hi Mike, that 84 sure looks great. You don’t often see these antique radios with a fuse like yours has. I usually instal...462ron — 10:22 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>