Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 2.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 40-140 Field Coil Replacement
#46

Thanks again. It's playing great, and with the price of new standard variacs down, I hardly ever plug in these oldies without one--especially the ones with transformers. I run at a constant 108 volts for safety. ciao !!!
#47

Hopefully this thread still has some life. After replacing the field coil with the resistor and installing a 4'' permanent magnet speaker, I was not happy with the cheap sound, so recently I changed to a 6'' speaker. The set picked up hum when I did that, so I had to increase the size of the second power cap from 4 uf to 16 uf before the hum left. I need to know if that is safe or not. Would the transformer get hotter? Seems to. Thanks !!!
#48

It shouldn't hurt anything to increase the value of the output filter cap. The transformer should not run hotter.

The extra hum was probably there all along since you did the conversion to a PM speaker; the 4 inch speaker, most likely, did not have the frequency response on the low end so that you heard it. The 6 incher obviously has a wider frequency response, so you started hearing the hum when you installed it. If the 16 uF output filter reduced the hum to an acceptable level, then you have done all you can.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#49

Ron, would the 16 uf cause the transformer to overheat? It does seem to be running a little warmer. I don't want to burn out a transformer for want of less hum. What happens inside the radio when you increase that capacitor? Thanks !!!
#50

As I said, the transformer should not run hotter with the larger cap. If it does, then something is either drawing more current than it should, or else the transformer was already marginal (that is, possibly damaged) from old, partially shorted electrolytics and continued operation in that condition.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#51

The transformer is not running overly hot. I think the difference is, on the last check the chassis was outside the case. This model does have a back on it, and there are a few tubes close to the transformer to increase the heat. Anyway, it's all good and I appreciate your responses.




Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM
A Marconi model 86
Thanks Arran; I don't even know what a double conversion is, but i do have a good friend In Nova Scotia that would k...Dan Walker — 07:01 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>