Another 16B question: Alignment
Posts: 1,106
Threads: 88
Joined: Jun 2011
City: Tacoma
State, Province, Country: Washington
Does anyone know how I could verify the adjustment of what a modern schematic would call the "Do not admit" compensators (the back two on the tuner itself)? This set has had the cover for these adjustments removed some time in the past, which says to me that perhaps someone has done some tweaking with them. How would one verify that these are at factory settings, or reset them to factory settings?
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
That says DO NOT ADJUST, not admit. It's not reproduced clearly in those Riders scans online.
BTW, your packet mails out today.
Chuck
Posts: 1,106
Threads: 88
Joined: Jun 2011
City: Tacoma
State, Province, Country: Washington
Chuck,
I know it says do not adjust. It's just that I'm pretty sure someone HAS adjusted them, as the cover used to block them is missing.
I used "do not admit" because that term is used in more modern equipment to denote an adjustment that should not be tampered with (especially in transmitting equipment).
Posts: 1,106
Threads: 88
Joined: Jun 2011
City: Tacoma
State, Province, Country: Washington
Bump? Still need help with this...
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Brenda
Sorry, I missed this previously.
The back two screws that originally have the metal piece over them stamped "DO NOT ADJUST" are antenna trimmers for the 4th/5th band and for band 2.
Numbering the four trimmers, from front to back, we have:
1 - Band 4/5 oscillator, to be adjusted on band 4 at 10.8 mc and then checked on band 5 at 21.6 mc.
2 - "Police" band (band 2) oscillator, adjust at 3.6 mc.
3 - "Police" band (band 2) antenna, adjust at 3.6 mc. Bear in mind that this will affect the sensitivity of the set on the three lowest bands, so check for proper operation on all three after adjusting.
4 - Band 4/5 antenna, to be adjusted on band 4 at 10.8 mc and then checked on band 5 at 21.6 mc.
I trust you have the alignment procedure which outlines the adjustment of all trimmers save for the "Do not admit" trimmers?
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 1,106
Threads: 88
Joined: Jun 2011
City: Tacoma
State, Province, Country: Washington
Ron,
Yes, I bought the service literature on this radio, so have the alignment procedures, etc.
Still no love getting bands 4 and 5 to oscillate below the middle of each band. There doesn't seem to be any resistance between the rotor of the tuner and the frame, but I'm going to see if bonding the rotor with solder wick to the frame helps.
Of note is this:
Looking at the LO output on my scope (cathode follower, no load on the LO), the BC band is strong, but quite distorted, with the bottom of the waveform truncated and flattened. Band 2 is similar. Band 3, 4, and 5, where they oscillate at all, are much closer to a natural sine wave, but are much lower in amplitude.
Posts: 1,106
Threads: 88
Joined: Jun 2011
City: Tacoma
State, Province, Country: Washington
Here's the update...
I got in the new 76 tube a few days ago. Tonight I installed it in the radio. After doing this, and making all modifications suggested in service notes, I now have the complete Band 4 working. Unfortunately, band 5 stops working below 13.5 MHz. If I raise the plate voltage to 100 volts or so, I can bring that down to 12.5, but it will not oscillate any lower. I've been offered a replacement LO coil for the SW bands, I'll see if that helps when it gets here.
In the meantime, does anyone have any suggestions as to things I can try?
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Mica capacitors associated with Band 5? Or it could be when you replace the coil, that the entire band will return?
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 1,106
Threads: 88
Joined: Jun 2011
City: Tacoma
State, Province, Country: Washington
Here's one to make a crazy person sane...
Last night, I put a new power cord on this radio (the old one was only about 3' long). After doing this, I lost about 2MHz at the bottom of Band 4 and almost 3MHz off of band 5. Odd thing is, I was working nowhere near the LO circuits..
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
Philco model 60
|
This is my thread on 60 from 2016.
I had to rewind the osc coil, and I actually counted the turns and then rewound i...morzh — 03:34 PM |
Philco model 60
|
Yes, Mark belongs to the same Michigan Antique Radio Club that I do. I suspect that the oscillator coil is in need of a ...Radios1340 — 03:10 PM |
A Marconi model 86
|
Yeah. I am dreading the thought of what to do with all my consoles when I will no longer be able to move them around.
I...morzh — 02:51 PM |
1947 Silvertone 7086 Wire Recorder/Phono/Radio on YouTube
|
Cool gadget, Buzz.
I took me a couple of second to undestand that that oscillating thing makes the wire to spool correc...morzh — 02:50 PM |
A Marconi model 86
|
My back hurts already, you could build a house with all the wood. PaulPaul Philco322 — 02:49 PM |
1947 Silvertone 7086 Wire Recorder/Phono/Radio on YouTube
|
Part 4 of this series now uploaded
link below to anyone interested
Buzz — 02:39 PM |
Philco model 60
|
Welcome to the Phorum, Radios1340! The oscillator coil on the 60 is a common culprit. I just bought a 60B (June 1934) ...GarySP — 02:33 PM |
Philco model 60
|
Yes, standard alignment procedure. I can get the minuscule tone to vary when adjusting the trimmers. But you almost have...Radios1340 — 01:40 PM |
A Marconi model 86
|
An imposing-looking radio, for sure.morzh — 12:43 PM |
Philco model 60
|
Model 60 struck again :lol:
Welcome to the Phorum!
Above is the article on Model 60. Could be of some use.
Now...morzh — 12:38 PM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently 6987 online users. [Complete List] » 1 Member(s) | 6986 Guest(s)
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00d17/00d175793acc78e93ba4255d4ab3e9188a10e078" alt=">"
|