Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Another 16B question: Alignment
#1

Does anyone know how I could verify the adjustment of what a modern schematic would call the "Do not admit" compensators (the back two on the tuner itself)? This set has had the cover for these adjustments removed some time in the past, which says to me that perhaps someone has done some tweaking with them. How would one verify that these are at factory settings, or reset them to factory settings?
#2

That says DO NOT ADJUST, not admit. It's not reproduced clearly in those Riders scans online.

BTW, your packet mails out today.

Chuck
#3

Chuck,

I know it says do not adjust. It's just that I'm pretty sure someone HAS adjusted them, as the cover used to block them is missing.

I used "do not admit" because that term is used in more modern equipment to denote an adjustment that should not be tampered with (especially in transmitting equipment).
#4

Bump? Still need help with this...
#5

Brenda

Sorry, I missed this previously.

The back two screws that originally have the metal piece over them stamped "DO NOT ADJUST" are antenna trimmers for the 4th/5th band and for band 2.

Numbering the four trimmers, from front to back, we have:

1 - Band 4/5 oscillator, to be adjusted on band 4 at 10.8 mc and then checked on band 5 at 21.6 mc.
2 - "Police" band (band 2) oscillator, adjust at 3.6 mc.
3 - "Police" band (band 2) antenna, adjust at 3.6 mc. Bear in mind that this will affect the sensitivity of the set on the three lowest bands, so check for proper operation on all three after adjusting.
4 - Band 4/5 antenna, to be adjusted on band 4 at 10.8 mc and then checked on band 5 at 21.6 mc.

I trust you have the alignment procedure which outlines the adjustment of all trimmers save for the "Do not admit" trimmers?

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#6

Ron,

Yes, I bought the service literature on this radio, so have the alignment procedures, etc.

Still no love getting bands 4 and 5 to oscillate below the middle of each band. There doesn't seem to be any resistance between the rotor of the tuner and the frame, but I'm going to see if bonding the rotor with solder wick to the frame helps.

Of note is this:

Looking at the LO output on my scope (cathode follower, no load on the LO), the BC band is strong, but quite distorted, with the bottom of the waveform truncated and flattened. Band 2 is similar. Band 3, 4, and 5, where they oscillate at all, are much closer to a natural sine wave, but are much lower in amplitude.
#7

Here's the update...

I got in the new 76 tube a few days ago. Tonight I installed it in the radio. After doing this, and making all modifications suggested in service notes, I now have the complete Band 4 working. Unfortunately, band 5 stops working below 13.5 MHz. If I raise the plate voltage to 100 volts or so, I can bring that down to 12.5, but it will not oscillate any lower. I've been offered a replacement LO coil for the SW bands, I'll see if that helps when it gets here.

In the meantime, does anyone have any suggestions as to things I can try?
#8

Mica capacitors associated with Band 5? Or it could be when you replace the coil, that the entire band will return?

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#9

Here's one to make a crazy person sane...

Last night, I put a new power cord on this radio (the old one was only about 3' long). After doing this, I lost about 2MHz at the bottom of Band 4 and almost 3MHz off of band 5. Odd thing is, I was working nowhere near the LO circuits.. Icon_cry




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM
A Marconi model 86
Thanks Arran; I don't even know what a double conversion is, but i do have a good friend In Nova Scotia that would k...Dan Walker — 07:01 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan; I've seen some Marconi sets like that before, one was a console though I'm not sure if it was a model 86. It's a...Arran — 05:09 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Milkjug plastic? Whatever is chosen for the spider, the material must be compatible with popular adhesives... Th...Chas — 05:05 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3124 online users. [Complete List]
» 4 Member(s) | 3120 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatarAvatar

>