Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Could someone pat me on the back?
#31

DKinYORKpa Wrote:OK, but, when I look in my RCA tube book and see 175VDC maximum on a 45 plate

You mean 275 VDC, don't you?

Quote:did they come up with that number on an old meter, as well?

Yes! Alan Douglas can correct me if I am wrong, but it is my understanding that 1000 ohms/volt was considered "state of the art" in 1930.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#32

I bought myself this, the ME-9E

(well, from another manufacturer, not Weston, but the Army gave orders to more than 3 companies to buold these).
Mine is practically new, looks like NOS or near-mint.

This has 20K/V on the left side, and the same voltages at 1K/V on the right.
Very handy to measure those voltages which were measured back then. With some precautions, of course.
#33

Quote:
Quote:If you don't see it it may be inside the filter can.

Nope, cap#11 is a bakelite cap block. It was removed by the last guy and I've rewired it and other things the best I can by following the schematic. While it works great, as I look at the schematic, the ungrounded side of #11 goes up to the coupling capacitors (#8&#8, mounted across RF xformers 9&10) thru a lug on the transformer........But wait!!!!!......after careful examination of the schematic AND the photo of the underneath of the chassis, the last guy took the wire that should have gone to cap #11 and ran it to the 2nd grid of the 1st and 2nd RF tubes! (the shiny solder should have tipped me off). So I ran that wire to #11. Sadly, the radio works as great as it did beforeIcon_lol. I've now made the last wrong right, though.
#34

Quote:You mean 275 VDC, don't you?

Yes, sorry.
#35

DKinYORKpa Wrote:Sadly, the radio works as great as it did beforeIcon_lol. I've now made the last wrong right, though.

Excellent! Icon_thumbup

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM
A Marconi model 86
Thanks Arran; I don't even know what a double conversion is, but i do have a good friend In Nova Scotia that would k...Dan Walker — 07:01 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>