Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

rebuilding tone control block
#1

Hello! I'm trying to work on my tone control. the problem is I'm not sure how to connect the new caps. I removed the tarry-goo and both caps came out. one still soldered to the bucket.

the loose wire was easy to find and trace back to the output tube.

[Image: http://i1303.photobucket.com/albums/ag14...4132e0.jpg]

The cap in the foreground below, has a bit of the wire on it from the 42 tube and the bit of black wire on it that appears that it was attached to the isolated part of the switch

[Image: http://i1303.photobucket.com/albums/ag14...f90462.jpg]

I'm just having confidence issues around how to hook them up.


would I hook them up like this? where the unconnected lead would go to the wire connected to the plate of the 42 tube.

[Image: http://i1303.photobucket.com/albums/ag14...903a6e.jpg]


thanks a bunch.. Icon_e_geek


Bret
#2

Yup the .01 lead goes to the chassis and the .02 goes to the lead to the plate of the 42.
Terry
#3

Terry, it did seem a bit like a simple question, after sleeping on it, but thank you.. Icon_smile
#4

No problem my friend sometimes even the simpler things confound me too.Just as for the fun of it you can play with the values of those two caps. Must be 600v jobs or better. You could change the .02 to a .005 this will make the audio very bright(will increase the high frequency response). Those caps act as a treble control and to stabilize the plate of the 42, it keeps it from oscillating. The 610 is a nice easy set to work on and is a great little player.
Terry
#5

Thanks Terry.. I was actually going to try that. I guess being from a modern era.. I've never really been very satisfied with the 2 to 4 tone choices on the old radios. seems to me the choices are bright, muddy, muddier & talking with your hand over your mouth. I'll have to get me one of those Zenith's with the RadioOrgan tone controls one of these days.

The caps I put in there were 400 volts.. but I have some 1600's on order. I read on the antique radio forum, somewhere, that when you have caps connected directly to the plate of the output tube to use 1600 volt or better, because of possible spikes from the plate of the output tube. I figure the 400's are ok for testing. The 3 conductor cloth speaker wire I ordered from Radio Daze is on back order... Boo.. so the new caps will probably show up before the wire does. I Should've gone with my original plan to just braid the brown cloth speaker wire like the original. I just didn't have enough to do it. Although, I may end up doing that anyhow, as the hole the wires go through is very narrow. my luck will be that the cloth sleeve won't fit.
#6

You could just replace the switch with a 500K pot. Then you would have a continuous control.
Terry
#7

The only place where I have heard (or read) it recommended to use higher a higher voltage cap is across the primary of the output transformer, I have not heard of it being an issue between plate and ground. In this case, if the diagram is accurate, closing the switch increases the capacity, opening it decreases it since you have two caps in series, it's more a treble cutting control then a tone control. Also since they are in series that means that the total voltage will be double that of a single cap so the only cap that you should be concerned with in terms of voltage rating is the .02 uf one. Tube radio audio isn't generally that bad as long as you replace all of the bias resistors in the audio stages as well as the caps.
Regards
Arran
#8

Ooops... Arran, You're right.. I checked my notes.. that particular control was a .01 that connected to the negative side of the e-caps and then the transformer center tap.. :-) well.. I have plenty of .01's @ 630.. for the .02, I'll use one of the orange drops when they come in.

after you explained what this particular control actually does.. my description makes more sense to me.. that's exactly what it sounds like.

That's an Idea, Terry.. I might just try that.

Thanks again, guys.. You've been a tremendous help and wealth of knowledge.

I'm sure I'll have a million more questions.. especially if I keep cleaning up @ these auctions.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3638 online users. [Complete List]
» 4 Member(s) | 3634 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatarAvatar

>