Posts: 114
Threads: 2
Joined: Jan 2014
City: Southport NC
The item was sold in an instant but its worth looking at simply for the fun of it and hopefully it went to a true collector. I would have thought more money but hey...Im sure the seller did just fine.
Nice to see bakelite in that condition huh? I hope the buyer keeps it all original. And maybe the pics are good enough for gallery?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/PHILCO-TRANSITON...7675.l2557
Posts: 1,532
Threads: 242
Joined: Sep 2012
City: West Bend, Wisconsin
Amazing find! This being a 1942 model, perhaps someone with knowledge that radio production was about to cease for the duration of the war, purchased this "just in case", put it on the attic shelf and promptly forgot about it? Or perhaps it was a gift (Christmas 1941?) that was never used? Who knows for sure. One thing is for certain, 70 + year-old NOS radios don't turn up very often!
Greg V.
West Bend, WI
Member WARCI.org
Posts: 114
Threads: 2
Joined: Jan 2014
City: Southport NC
Nice isn't it? I see something like that and I think its gotta be like finding a roll or two of uncirculated silver dollars. The bakelite is just a trip to see in that condition.
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
NostalgiaRadioTime Wrote:This being a 1942 model
It's actually a January 1940 model.
http://www.philcoradio.com/gallery/1940c.htm
Still a very neat find...
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 16,313
Threads: 569
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
Yes indeed! I want at least one NOS in my collection.
Now. I would, in THIS PARTICULAR CASE ONLY, salvage electrolytics (paper caps havevto go) by trying to reform them. If not possible, then, of course, change them. RESTUFFING ONLY. This one is worth the effort.
Posts: 1,407
Threads: 72
Joined: Oct 2007
City: Linn Creek, MO
I would not touch the radio. I would put it back in the box and display box and all.
Steve
M R Radios C M Tubes
Posts: 16,313
Threads: 569
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
If you want to keep it as NOS and never play it, sure.
Posts: 1,532
Threads: 242
Joined: Sep 2012
City: West Bend, Wisconsin
Even better, Ron! I was going through the photo gallery here to try to find it and guess I didn't go back far enough. I only went back as far as the 42-PT26.
Greg V.
West Bend, WI
Member WARCI.org
Posts: 4,825
Threads: 54
Joined: Sep 2008
City: Sandwick, BC, CA
It's a common enough model, with fairly predictable performance characteristics, that I think I would leave it just as it is, non functional. If I wanted a PT-26 in working order I would overhaul one that was not new old stock, but still in close to original condition. Which reminds me, I have one of the Canadian versions of this set downstairs, unfortunately I had to repair a crack in the cabinet and paint it. I would save the pictures posted of this set, they will make good reference photos for restoring other PT-26s like where the stickers are located and so forth. It's interesting how they used cloth backed tape to hold the box together.
Regards
Arran
P.S That seller is goofy and rather overpriced on most of his radios, that Philco was likely the only one worth anywhere close to his asking price, take this little gem for example:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rare-Vintage-195...27dfda1899
Rare? Worth $79.99? I don't think so. This series of portables was built between about 1955-59 and they built 10s or 1000s of the things, that one is on the older end of that range since it still uses the squiggled "M" logo.
(This post was last modified: 06-29-2014, 09:28 PM by Arran.)
Posts: 244
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Black Mountain, NC
Neat for sure. Did anyone notice the age related degradation of the power cord insulation?
Cossor 3468
GE 417A
Philco 118H
Radiola 17/100
Scott 800B6
Silvertone 6130
Stromberg 535M
Truetone D1952
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
|
Nice radio, Mike! Here's hoping it was well rebuilt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! GaryGarySP — 12:12 AM |
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
|
Rich
yes, this is the way I got it. I have just put it on the table and took it apart.
I suspect it even might work,...morzh — 11:31 PM |
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
|
Hello mike,
What nice looking radio I have one AK in my collection it's a console I have not started restoring it yet ....radiorich — 11:21 PM |
91H Code 126 Restore
|
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM |
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
|
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct.
So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM |
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
|
Arran
Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM |
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
|
Mike;
I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM |
91H Code 126 Restore
|
Thanks Arran,
I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM |
91H Code 126 Restore
|
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means? I haven't traced it out yet.
An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM |
91H Code 126 Restore
|
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently no members online. |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00d17/00d175793acc78e93ba4255d4ab3e9188a10e078" alt=">"
|