Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Model ID Please?
#1

I've looked through the 30's lineups and cannot find this set. Help anyone?
Thanks!


Attached Files Image(s)
   
#2

That is not a Philco. Looks like a Majestic?

(since this isn't a Philco, I have moved this topic to Other Radios (Non-Philco).

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

(09-24-2014, 09:47 PM)Ron Ramirez Wrote:  That is not a Philco. Looks like a Majestic?

(since this isn't a Philco, I have moved this topic to Other Radios (Non-Philco).

Thanks, Ron....... no wonder I couldn't find it! The person selling this thought it was a Philco, but I was interested mostly from the condition.
I'll check at the radiomuseum site under Majestic ????...perhaps another member recognizes it?
#4

 Where are you located? That may help narrow down what make and model that set is. Most Majestic sets I've seen have the name stamped right into the dial escutcheon, they also have a plate on the back of the chassis that says "Majestic" Grigsby-Grunow Inc, Chicago, or in Canada "Majestic" Standard Radio Manufacturing. LTD., Toronto or alternatively  "Majestic" Rogers-Majestic Corporation, LTD, Toronto.
  However Majestic brand radios were not the only ones that look like this, at least in Canada, I've seen Rogers sets that are almost identical to the Majestic ones except for the name "Rogers Batteryless" being stamped on the escutcheon. I have also seen Canadian Marconi and Canadian Westinghouse sets that have a very similar design. One thing that may hep is if you could post a photo of the set from the rear, or even of the chassis itself. It is definitely not a Philco though, Canadian or American.
Regards
Arran




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, Wow ! far as my AK it does work and the cabinet is in nice shape so is my chassis anyway here is a photo of...radiorich — 02:59 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Nice radio, Mike! Here's hoping it was well rebuilt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! GaryGarySP — 12:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Rich yes, this is the way I got it. I have just put it on the table and took it apart. I suspect it even might work,...morzh — 11:31 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello mike, What nice looking radio I have one AK in my collection it's a console I have not started restoring it yet ....radiorich — 11:21 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4080 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 4079 Guest(s)
Avatar

>