Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

41-280, -286, -287, -290 1st IF Xfmr
#5

Arran;

Before the advent of the superhet design, there were lots of tuned radio frequency radios (TRF). Those had multiple RF amplifiers, each with its own tuned circuitry in order to have adequate selectivity. Selectivity is more of an issue when tuning a weak station next to a strong station. The selectivity helps to keep the strong station from wiping out the weak signal station. Philco had some high end radios in the middle to late 1930s that even had IF circuits with adjustable selectivity. RF sensitivity is more of an issue on shortwave bands, especially the higher frequencies. On the AM broadcast band not much sensitivity is really needed. I have a Hallicrafters SX-25 which has two 6SK7 RF amplifier circuits. On the AM broadcast band one RF amplifier stage is not used. A 4-gang tuning capacitor is used along with a 4-gang fine tuning capacitor. It has two IF amplifier stages with switchable extra coils in the IF transformers plus a crystal filter for CW and voice only reception. It does do a better job of receiving shortwave stations than the Philco 40-201, but then it is not a broad-band radio with the best audio frequency response. The 40-201 has limited use on shortwave bands as its tuning is coarse and very touchy on the highest shortwave band.

It is interesting to see the variations in design offered by various companies during the 1930s and 1940s. A significant number of people were keeping up with foreign news due to events leading up to WWII. After WWII interest in shortwave broadcasting dropped off. Consequently the number of sets offering shortwave reception declined.

Joe


Messages In This Thread
RE: 41-280, -286, -287, -290 1st IF Xfmr - by Joeztech - 10-21-2016, 07:24 AM



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
RCA T62 is playing.....
Beautiful set.morzh — 09:07 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Well....here it is. The green stuff. Unfortunately, probably penetrates deep. I opened the top layer and saw that: ...morzh — 08:58 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: Really nice workmanship!!! Top of the chassis looks great. Sorry about the long winded e...MrFixr55 — 08:09 PM
Philco 40-120C Restoration
Thank you for your reply. I will check voltages on the other tubes, look at resistor 23 and cap 25, etc. If all else fai...bluecap — 07:58 PM
RCA T62 is playing.....
Nice looking set great save. DavidDavid — 07:48 PM
Philco 89 indicator light.
Hello Jim, I have done several 89s. The trick is to move the drum in or out on it's shaft. You will need to loosen a set...dconant — 07:36 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
MrFixr Yes, it is my plan to go with 45rpm spider if I go that far. No, the pole was not left-handed as I unscrewed ...morzh — 07:14 PM
Philco 40-120C Restoration
Change the tube. Check the tube's bias network. Are any other tubes experience the drop or just this?` Is resistor 23 OK...morzh — 07:09 PM
Philco 89 indicator light.
I forgot how the pointer is formed: could you show the way it is formed and how you tried to change it?morzh — 07:01 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Was that pole piece left handed ? Since the metal "spider" is toast, wonder if you can either get the "4...MrFixr55 — 06:54 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 9051 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 9048 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>