Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 40-165
#18

I have searched for a 270 ohm resistor the schematic calls shows, however, no matter how many times I trace the old wiring I come back to a 470 ohm resistor that looks as if it was put in after manufacture.  The soldering on the leads is shiny and sloppy.  The after market notes I have do not indicate a change however my notes are probably incomplete.  Should I replace the 470 with a 470 or replace it with a 270 the schematic indicates?
Thanks...Jim


Messages In This Thread
Philco 40-165 - by jmcgill - 06-02-2017, 08:10 PM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by Radioroslyn - 06-03-2017, 04:42 AM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by jmcgill - 06-04-2017, 05:13 PM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by Radioroslyn - 06-05-2017, 10:45 AM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by jmcgill - 06-05-2017, 01:42 PM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by morzh - 06-05-2017, 02:04 PM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by Radioroslyn - 06-05-2017, 04:05 PM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by jmcgill - 06-06-2017, 01:40 PM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by Radioroslyn - 06-06-2017, 04:12 PM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by jmcgill - 06-07-2017, 09:46 AM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by morzh - 06-07-2017, 10:42 AM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by Radioroslyn - 06-07-2017, 01:22 PM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by Ron Ramirez - 06-11-2017, 11:00 AM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by Radioroslyn - 06-11-2017, 11:14 AM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by jmcgill - 06-11-2017, 03:20 PM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by Radioroslyn - 06-11-2017, 04:03 PM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by jmcgill - 07-26-2017, 06:46 PM
RE: Philco 40-165 - by Radioroslyn - 07-26-2017, 07:26 PM
40-165 - by jmcgill - 06-11-2017, 09:45 AM



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>