Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Started in on a 41-300
#6

Tnx!
So I got it playing and noticed that the volume and tone control were noisy this started an adventure as they are difficult to get at. Have to remove the p/b assy and the thumbwheels which are kinda tricky. Finally got the pots apart hit them w/some wd-40 and now they behaving nicely.

After I reassembled the vol/tone controls I powered it up to check to hear if I had made improvement. Applied ac current  and after about 20 sec smoke bellowed out of the 1st IF transformer along with the 80 glowing RED. Well that's new! I thought I had gotten rid of the curse of the 660L. Checked the resistance along the HV path and didn't find anything that was shorted. Did find a blob of loose solder perched on of the wires on the IF transformers but wasn't shorting any thing. What it was was a bit of rubber wire that was arcing to the chassis. Wasn't a short till  you put HV on it. wire looked good on the top, it wasn't very apparent. I guess I need to replace some more rubber wire.

Going to set it aside till the switch comes in, now I have it working w/the p/b assy out. Will have to fabricate a bracket  for the switch. Plays well and is good sounding even w/o the feedback connected.

Otr will be heard on the 116X tonight.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry


Messages In This Thread
Started in on a 41-300 - by Radioroslyn - 07-29-2017, 12:38 AM
RE: Started in on a 41-300 - by sam - 07-29-2017, 01:09 AM
RE: Started in on a 41-300 - by Radioroslyn - 07-29-2017, 01:19 PM
RE: Started in on a 41-300 - by Radioroslyn - 07-29-2017, 03:29 PM
RE: Started in on a 41-300 - by klondike98 - 07-29-2017, 06:03 PM
RE: Started in on a 41-300 - by Radioroslyn - 07-29-2017, 09:14 PM
RE: Started in on a 41-300 - by Radioroslyn - 08-03-2017, 04:43 PM
RE: Started in on a 41-300 - by Radioroslyn - 08-03-2017, 10:52 PM
RE: Started in on a 41-300 - by Radioroslyn - 08-09-2017, 08:12 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>